Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (2026)

Restraining orders or injunctions - Penalty for violation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 776,s 13, eff. 4/23/2024.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 459, Secs.s 8, s 9, s 10 eff. 9/30/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 459, s 7, eff. 9/30/2019.

Acts 1977, ch. 438, § 9; 1991, ch. 468, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1982–2025 · leading case: Discover Bank v. Morgan, 363 S.W.3d 479 (Tenn. 2012).
Discover Bank v. Morgan, 363 S.W.3d 479 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 2× “at *7 (quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)(1)). The Court of Appeals ruled that the fees consumers paid were the appropriate measure of damages — not the charges they made on their cards: "We see no basis for including the credit card debts that consumers voluntarily incurred…”
Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 249 S.W.3d 301 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 47-18-108. In such actions, the remedy is not limited to injunctive relief, but rather the court may award restitution on behalf on those consumers who have suffered an ascertainable loss.”
Pyburn v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, 63 S.W.3d 351 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “T.C.A. § 47-18-108 further gives the Attorney General the power to seek injunctive relief in a court of competent jurisdiction whenever the Division of Consumer Affairs “has reason to believe that any person has engaged in, is engaging in, or, based upon information received…”
State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 2× “The complaint sought civil penalties “of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation to the State as provided by Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)” against each of the defendants.”
Crossley Constr. Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 237 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(11) (2001). Defendant’s actions that Plaintiff complains about in its Amended Complaint relative to its Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977 claim were not connected with “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution .”
California v. Infineon Tech. AG, 531 F. Supp. 2d 1124 (N.D. Cal. 2007). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(a-b). Finally, while it is true that other statutory provisions empower the Attorney General to generally institute all actions necessary to enforce the laws, including actions on behalf of the state and its agencies to recover “public funds,” this…”
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney Gen. & Reporter v. HRC Med. Centers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 20× “That pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (a)(1), (a)(4), and (a)(5), this Court temporarily and permanently enjoin and restrain TCPA Defendants from engaging in the aforementioned acts or practices which violate the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977.”
Honeycutt v. First Fed. Bank, 278 F. Supp. 2d 893 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). · cites it 2× “Defendant also argues that Plaintiff is not a “consumer” within the meaning of Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (2). Plaintiff contends that the mortgage loan pre-approval letter clearly misrepresented that Ms.”
Memphis Publ'g Co. v. Leech, 539 F. Supp. 405 (W.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108; Stipulations at ¶ 7.”
State v. Travis Thompson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 13× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (b)(1) (2001) (emphasis added).”
State of Tennessee, Ex Rel. Herbert Slatery III v. The Witherspoon Law Grp. PLLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “The particular statute related to actions brought by the attorney general provides that “[t]he court may . . . order reimbursement to the state for the reasonable costs and expenses of investigation and prosecution of actions under this part, including attorneys’ fees.”
State of Tennessee v. Jonathon Trotter (2019). · cites it 3× “Therefore, pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 47-18-108 (b)(3) and 23-3-103(c)(1), the Court hereby assesses a civil penalty of $7,300 against Defendant and payable to Plaintiff based on 73 violations of the TCPA and UPL Statute.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(11): 1 case
Crossley Constr. Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford, 237 S.W.3d 652 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(11) (2001). Defendant’s actions that Plaintiff complains about in its Amended Complaint relative to its Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977 claim were not connected with “the advertising, offering for sale, lease or rental, or distribution .”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(a)(1): 2 cases
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney Gen. & Reporter v. HRC Med. Centers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “That pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (a)(1), (a)(4), and (a)(5), this Court temporarily and permanently enjoin and restrain TCPA Defendants from engaging in the aforementioned acts or practices which violate the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(a)(2): 1 case
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney Gen. & Reporter v. HRC Med. Centers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “That pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (a)(1), (a)(4), and (a)(5), this Court temporarily and permanently enjoin and restrain TCPA Defendants from engaging in the aforementioned acts or practices which violate the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b): 2 cases
State v. Thompson, 197 S.W.3d 685 (Tenn. 2006). “The complaint sought civil penalties “of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation to the State as provided by Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)” against each of the defendants.”
State v. Travis Thompson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (b)(1) (2001) (emphasis added).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)(1): 3 cases
Discover Bank v. Morgan, 363 S.W.3d 479 (Tenn. 2012). “at *7 (quoting Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)(1)). The Court of Appeals ruled that the fees consumers paid were the appropriate measure of damages — not the charges they made on their cards: "We see no basis for including the credit card debts that consumers voluntarily incurred…”
State v. Travis Thompson (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (b)(1) (2001) (emphasis added).”
State of Tennessee Ex Rel. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney Gen. & Reporter v. HRC Med. Centers, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “That pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108 (a)(1), (a)(4), and (a)(5), this Court temporarily and permanently enjoin and restrain TCPA Defendants from engaging in the aforementioned acts or practices which violate the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act of 1977.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-18-108(b)(l): 1 case
Walker v. Sunrise Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 249 S.W.3d 301 (Tenn. 2008). “§ 47-18-108. In such actions, the remedy is not limited to injunctive relief, but rather the court may award restitution on behalf on those consumers who have suffered an ascertainable loss.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.