Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-508 (2026)

Cure by seller of improper tender or delivery - Replacement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1963, ch. 81, § 1 (2-508).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1975–1999 · leading case: Great Am. Music Mach., Inc. v. Mid-South Record Pressing Co., 393 F. Supp. 877 (M.D. Tenn. 1975).
Great Am. Music Mach., Inc. v. Mid-South Record Pressing Co., 393 F. Supp. 877 (M.D. Tenn. 1975). · cites it 2× “The delivery of the second batch of records did not constitute a cure within the meaning of T.C.A. § 47-2-508, as the damage had already occurred and the time set for performance had expired.”
O'Bryant v. Reeder Chevrolet (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The appellant argues that the language of the statute “substantially impairs its value to him if he has accepted it” is plainly subjective, and that the question of whether the defect is remedial is irrelevant in light of T.C.A. § 47-2-508, the right-to-cure statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.