Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-510 (2026)

Effect of breach on risk of loss

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1963, ch. 81, § 1 (2-510).


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2013 · leading case: Moses v. Newman, 658 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).
Moses v. Newman, 658 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “For the risk to shift to the purchaser, the purchaser must receive the goods and the seller must fulfill his contractual obligations.”
3L Commc'ns L.L.C. v. Jodi Merola, Individually, & d/b/a NY Telecom Supply (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 17× “”), we concluded that the risk of loss had not shifted to the buyer: For the risk to shift to the purchaser, the purchaser must receive the goods and the seller must fulfill his contractual obligations. “Under subsection (1) the seller by his individual action cannot -8- shift…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-2-510(1): 2 cases
Moses v. Newman, 658 S.W.2d 119 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). “For the risk to shift to the purchaser, the purchaser must receive the goods and the seller must fulfill his contractual obligations.”
3L Commc'ns L.L.C. v. Jodi Merola, Individually, & d/b/a NY Telecom Supply (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “”), we concluded that the risk of loss had not shifted to the buyer: For the risk to shift to the purchaser, the purchaser must receive the goods and the seller must fulfill his contractual obligations. “Under subsection (1) the seller by his individual action cannot -8- shift…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.