Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602 (2026)

Part definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires:

Acts 1975, ch. 232, § 1; T.C.A., § 69-702; Acts 1988, ch. 1033, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1990–2020 · leading case: Dr. Pepper Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Dyersburg, LLC v. Reagan Farr, Comm'r of Tennessee Dep't of Revenue, 393 S.W.3d 201 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011).
Dr. Pepper Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Dyersburg, LLC v. Reagan Farr, Comm'r of Tennessee Dep't of Revenue, 393 S.W.3d 201 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Pepper also cites multiple dictionary entries for the term “produce,” which allegedly include “to provide, furnish, or supply,” “to cause to occur or exist[,]” and “a person, company, or country to makes, grows, or supplies good or commodities for sale.”
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 1418 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). · cites it 3× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-25-602(2) defines a “dealer” as “any person, firm, corporation, or partnership engaged in the sale of petroleum products to the public at retail.”
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn. 1993). · cites it 14× “” For purposes of this statute, the term “cost to the retailer” is defined in T.C.A. § 47-25-602(1) as follows: “Cost to the retailer” means the sum of: (A)The lower of: (i) The purchase price of petroleum distillates to the retailer, less all trade discounts, allowances, or…”
Shah v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 275 F. Supp. 2d 920 (E.D. Tenn. 2001). · cites it 6× “” See T.C.A. § 47-25-602(11) (emphasis added). Thus, unless plaintiffs are dealers, RPI does not fall within the scope of the statutory definition of a “vertically integrated producer.”
Best Choice Roofing & Home Improvement, Inc. v. Best Choice Roofing Savannah, LLC (M.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 2× “wise; provided, that ‘franchise’ means only such agreement where the franchisee is required to be licensed under § 57-3-203; and provided further, that a franchise is not created by a lease, license or concession granted by a retailer to sell goods or furnish services on or from…”
Shah v. Racetrac Petro Co (6th Cir. 2003). “As a consequence, this Court Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602 (2) defines dealer as “any should broadly interpret the definition of dealer by including person, firm, corporation or partnership engaged in the sale of those operators, like Plaintiffs, who are involved in the petroleum…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602(1): 1 case
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn. 1993). “” For purposes of this statute, the term “cost to the retailer” is defined in T.C.A. § 47-25-602(1) as follows: “Cost to the retailer” means the sum of: (A)The lower of: (i) The purchase price of petroleum distillates to the retailer, less all trade discounts, allowances, or…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602(11): 1 case
Shah v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 275 F. Supp. 2d 920 (E.D. Tenn. 2001). “” See T.C.A. § 47-25-602(11) (emphasis added). Thus, unless plaintiffs are dealers, RPI does not fall within the scope of the statutory definition of a “vertically integrated producer.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602(2): 3 cases
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 1418 (M.D. Tenn. 1990). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-25-602(2) defines a “dealer” as “any person, firm, corporation, or partnership engaged in the sale of petroleum products to the public at retail.”
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn. 1993). “” For purposes of this statute, the term “cost to the retailer” is defined in T.C.A. § 47-25-602(1) as follows: “Cost to the retailer” means the sum of: (A)The lower of: (i) The purchase price of petroleum distillates to the retailer, less all trade discounts, allowances, or…”
Shah v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 275 F. Supp. 2d 920 (E.D. Tenn. 2001). “” See T.C.A. § 47-25-602(11) (emphasis added). Thus, unless plaintiffs are dealers, RPI does not fall within the scope of the statutory definition of a “vertically integrated producer.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602(6): 1 case
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn. 1993). “” For purposes of this statute, the term “cost to the retailer” is defined in T.C.A. § 47-25-602(1) as follows: “Cost to the retailer” means the sum of: (A)The lower of: (i) The purchase price of petroleum distillates to the retailer, less all trade discounts, allowances, or…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-602(9): 2 cases
Ghem, Inc. v. Mapco Petroleum, Inc., 850 S.W.2d 447 (Tenn. 1993). “” For purposes of this statute, the term “cost to the retailer” is defined in T.C.A. § 47-25-602(1) as follows: “Cost to the retailer” means the sum of: (A)The lower of: (i) The purchase price of petroleum distillates to the retailer, less all trade discounts, allowances, or…”
Shah v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc., 275 F. Supp. 2d 920 (E.D. Tenn. 2001). “” See T.C.A. § 47-25-602(11) (emphasis added). Thus, unless plaintiffs are dealers, RPI does not fall within the scope of the statutory definition of a “vertically integrated producer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.