Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627 (2026)

Determination of whether conduct was commercially reasonable

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 2000, ch. 846, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: R & J of Tennessee, Inc. v. Blankenship-Melton Real Est., Inc., 166 S.W.3d 195 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004).
R & J of Tennessee, Inc. v. Blankenship-Melton Real Est., Inc., 166 S.W.3d 195 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “2d 347, 350 (1966); see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-627(b) (2003). The trial court found that R & J conducted the sale in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner.”
Regions Bank v. Trailer Source (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 3× “According to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627 (a), a disposition of collateral is made in a commercially reasonable manner if made: (1) In the usual manner on any recognized market; (2) At the price current in any recognized market at the time of the disposition; or (3) Otherwise in…”
R&J of Tennessee, Inc. v. Blankenship-Melton Real Est., Inc., & Walden Blankenship, Individually (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “1966); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627 (b) (2003). The trial court found that R & J conducted the sale in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627(a): 1 case
Regions Bank v. Trailer Source (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “According to Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627 (a), a disposition of collateral is made in a commercially reasonable manner if made: (1) In the usual manner on any recognized market; (2) At the price current in any recognized market at the time of the disposition; or (3) Otherwise in…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-9-627(b): 1 case
R & J of Tennessee, Inc. v. Blankenship-Melton Real Est., Inc., 166 S.W.3d 195 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “2d 347, 350 (1966); see also Tenn.Code Ann. § 47-9-627(b) (2003). The trial court found that R & J conducted the sale in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.