Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-1-102 (2026)

Administration generally

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 493, s 1, eff. 5/25/2021.

Acts 1925, ch. 115, § 2; Shan. Supp., § 1487a16; Code 1932, § 2307; Acts 1974, ch. 654, § 1; 1979, ch. 20, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 49-102; Acts 1984 (1st Ex. Sess.), ch. 6, § 2; 1992, ch. 535, § 63.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–2019 · leading case: Crites v. Smith, 826 S.W.2d 459 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991).
Crites v. Smith, 826 S.W.2d 459 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “They have assumed responsibility to act on the requests for exemptions without first obtaining policy direction from the Board of Education as required by Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 49-1-102 (a), -102(b) (1990) and Tenn.”
The City of Humboldt v. J.R. McKnight (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “Finally, the court found that Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-1-102 places the duty on the county to operate a school system.”
State Ex Rel. Candice McQueen v. Metro. Nashville Bd. of Pub. Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-1-102 (c). The facts that brought about the lawsuit are not in dispute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.