Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601 (2026)
Short title - Statement of purpose
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) This part shall be known and may be cited as the "Professional Educators Collaborative Conferencing Act of 2011."
- (b)
- (1) Local boards of education and their professional employees have an obligation to the public to exert their full and continuing efforts to achieve the highest possible education standards in the institutions that they serve. This requires establishment and maintenance of an educational climate and working environment that will attract and retain a highly qualified professional staff and foster open, collaborative relationships between boards of education and their professional employees based upon mutual respect, in order to stimulate optimum performance by the staff and encourage each and every professional employee to contribute the employee's best to the enhancement of public schools. In order to best achieve these ends, it is the purpose of this part to set forth and recognize the legitimate rights and obligations of boards of education and their professional employees, to establish procedures governing their respective roles and the important relationships between them, and to promote a professional climate based upon mutual interest in order to focus efforts on teaching and learning for all students of the public schools.
- (2) Experience has shown that boards of education and their professional employees can best reach the objectives described in subdivision (b)(1), if each considers the ability, experience and judgment of the other in formulating policies and making decisions that involve the operations of this state's public schools through a collaborative effort of mutual interest and mutual gain. It also has been shown that professional employees can perform at their best when goals and expectations as to the terms and conditions of professional service are set forth with clarity, reliability and fairness to all in a manner demonstrating concern and respect for the interests of the individual employee.
- (3) It is the purpose and policy of this part to recognize the interests of individual employees in their relations with boards of education and to recognize certain rights, but not obligations, of professional employees to form, join and assist professional employees' organizations, such rights and responsibilities to include meeting, consulting and conferencing with boards of education in order to discuss matters relating to specific terms and conditions of professional service. Furthermore, in order to foster trust and mutual respect among the parties, and to provide an open and collaborative problem-solving approach to such conferencing, it is the purpose and policy of this part to recognize and adopt the principles and techniques known as interest-based collaborative problem-solving for use in conferences conducted pursuant to this part.
- (c) A training program in the principles and techniques of interest-based collaborative problem-solving for use in collaborative conferencing pursuant to this part shall be developed by the Tennessee Organization of School Superintendents in conjunction with representative organizations of school leaders and administrators and professional employees' organizations by January 1, 2012, at which time a summary report of the training program and related materials, if any, shall be presented to the education committees of the senate and the house of representatives. Such training program shall be implemented, as appropriate, within each local education agency no later than July 1, 2012.
- (d) Any and all bargaining being conducted pursuant to the [former] Education Professional Negotiations Act on June 1, 2011, shall be suspended indefinitely.
- (e) No collaborative conferencing pursuant to this part shall be conducted by a local board of education until the training developed under this part has been implemented within the local education agency.
Acts 1978, ch. 570, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 49-5501; Acts 2002, ch. 683, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007).
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 (2002). He alleged nine violations of the Master Contract.”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 60 S.W.3d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “re Act, as amended, and the Knox County Charter govern the rights, privileges and tenure status of employees of the Knox County School System; (2) a declaration that the employment contract proposed by Superintendent Morgan to the principals of Knox County violates the…”
Smith Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Anderson, 676 S.W.2d 328 (Tenn. 1984). “The issues raised on appeal are: (1) Does a public body engaged in litigation have the right to meet in private with its legal representatives? (2) Is a party to an action brought under the Education Professional Negotiations Act, T.C.A. § 49-5-601 to 5-604, or the Open Meetings…”
Muhlheim v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 2 S.W.3d 927 (Tenn. 1999). “The plaintiffs also contend that the Education Professional Negotiations Act, Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601, et sec/., does not allow workers’ compensation to be a negotiable term in the bargaining process.”
Blount Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Blount Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 78 S.W.3d 307 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “, was passed with the stated purpose of prescribing the legitimate rights and obligations of boards of education and professional employees, and to establish procedures governing the relationship between these two entities.”
Hamilton Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Hamilton Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 822 F.3d 831 (6th Cir. 2016). “378 (codified as amended at Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 to -609 (2011)).”
Hamblen Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Hamblen Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 892 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). “This case involves a dispute between 1 The Hamblen County Board of Education (Board), and the Hamblen County Education Association (Association), the latter being the duly recognized exclusive representative of all of the Board’s professional employees pursuant to the provisions…”
Franklin Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Crabtree, 337 S.W.3d 808 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “2007), it is clear that the provisions of the Education Professional Negotiations Act (“EPNA”) as codified at Tennessee Code Annotated § 49-5-601 et seq. do not apply to coaching or non-licensed positions.”
Marion Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Marion Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 86 S.W.3d 202 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “The locally negotiated agreements referred to in these statutes are those adopted pursuant to Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 et seq., the Education Professional Negotiations Act.”
Esquinance v. Polk Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 195 S.W.3d 35 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The controversy before us springs from the Education Professional Negotiations Act, T.C.A. § 49-5-601- § 49-5-618 (2002). The purpose of the Act is explicitly set out in T.”
Knox Cnty. v. City of Knoxville, 786 S.W.2d 936 (Tenn. 1990). “*938 On 9 April 1986 the County Board and KCEA, collective bargaining agent for county teachers, entered into a memorandum of understanding in accordance with the provisions of the Educational Professional Negotiations Act, T.C.A. § 49-5-601 et seq. This memorandum was to extend…”
Jefferson Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Jefferson Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 393 S.E.2d 653 (W. Va. 1990). “1984); Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 49-5-601 to -613 (1983) (teachers); Wash.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601(b) — 2 cases
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 (2002). He alleged nine violations of the Master Contract.”
Esquinance v. Polk Cnty. Educ. Ass'n, 195 S.W.3d 35 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). “The controversy before us springs from the Education Professional Negotiations Act, T.C.A. § 49-5-601- § 49-5-618 (2002). The purpose of the Act is explicitly set out in T.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601(b)(1) — 2 cases
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 (2002). He alleged nine violations of the Master Contract.”
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601(b)(3) — 1 case
Blount Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Blount Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 78 S.W.3d 307 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). “, was passed with the stated purpose of prescribing the legitimate rights and obligations of boards of education and professional employees, and to establish procedures governing the relationship between these two entities.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601(b)(5) — 1 case
Lawrence Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Lawrence Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 244 S.W.3d 302 (Tenn. 2007). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 49-5-601 (2002). He alleged nine violations of the Master Contract.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 49-5-601(b)(l) — 1 case
Knox Cnty. Educ. Ass'n v. Knox Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 60 S.W.3d 65 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “re Act, as amended, and the Knox County Charter govern the rights, privileges and tenure status of employees of the Knox County School System; (2) a declaration that the employment contract proposed by Superintendent Morgan to the principals of Knox County violates the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.