Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-8-102 (2026)

Privilege tax - Motor vehicle tax

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 541, s 2, eff. 3/5/2018.

Amended by 2014 Tenn. Acts, ch. 547, s 1, eff. 3/17/2014.

Acts 1915, ch. 101, § 2; Shan., § 1916a1; Code 1932, § 3329; modified; Acts 1976, ch. 618, § 1; 1977, ch. 76, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 5-802; Acts 1983, ch. 409, § 1; 1984, ch. 510, § 1; 1984, ch. 773, § 1; 1985, ch. 42, § 1; 1986, ch. 530, § 1; 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 1993, ch. 518, §§ 17, 21; 2009 , ch. 530, § 126.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1991–1997 · leading case: Brackin v. Sumner Cnty. ex rel. Sumner Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 814 S.W.2d 57 (Tenn. 1991).
Brackin v. Sumner Cnty. ex rel. Sumner Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 814 S.W.2d 57 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 10× “This situation arose when the County Commission of Sumner County passed a resolution on 7 August 1989, authorized by T.C.A. § 5-8-102. This statute authorizes counties to levy a motor vehicle privilege tax as a condition precedent to the operation of a motor vehicle within the…”
Profill Dev., Inc. v. Dills, 960 S.W.2d 17 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 4-36-401 (1996); wheel taxes, T.C.A. § 5-8-102 (1993); metropolitan forms of government, T.”
Profill Dev. v. Dills, Comm (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 4-36-401 (1996); wheel taxes, T.C.A. § 5-8-102 (1993); metropolitan forms of government, T.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 5-8-102(c)(2): 1 case
Brackin v. Sumner Cnty. ex rel. Sumner Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 814 S.W.2d 57 (Tenn. 1991). “This situation arose when the County Commission of Sumner County passed a resolution on 7 August 1989, authorized by T.C.A. § 5-8-102. This statute authorizes counties to levy a motor vehicle privilege tax as a condition precedent to the operation of a motor vehicle within the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.