Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (2026)

Limitation of time, claims and actions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1919, ch. 123, § 24; Shan. Supp., § 3608a173; Code 1932, § 6874; Acts 1947, ch. 139, § 4; C. Supp. 1950, § 6874; impl. am. Acts 1980, ch. 534, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 50-1003; Acts 1996, ch. 944, § 13; 1998, ch. 1024, §§ 1, 2; 1999, ch. 520, § 41; 2004, ch. 962, § 14; 2005, ch. 390, §§ 5, 6; 2008, ch. 1183, § 10; 2013, ch. 282, § 1; 2013, ch. 289, §§ 31 - 34; 2015, ch. 341, §§ 4, 15.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 142 cases (53 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638 (Tenn. 2008).
Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 20× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (a) (1999) (emphasis added).”
Lacey Chapman v. Davita, Inc., 380 S.W.3d 710 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 10× “The benefit review conference process is statutorily described as: (a)(1) Notwithstanding any provisions of this chapter to the contrary, in case of a dispute over or failure to agree upon compensation under this chapter, between the employer and employée or the dependent or…”
Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Britt, 211 S.W.3d 706 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 10× “Upon due consideration, we hold that the claim in this matter is not time-barred by the statute of limitations set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203 because the statute does not begin to run until the employee is prevented from working due to the employee’s…”
Lynch v. City of Jellico, 205 S.W.3d 384 (Tenn. 2006). · cites it 7× “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a) (“[n]o claim for compensation under [the] Workers’ Compensation Law .”
Gerdau Ameristeel, Inc. v. Steven Ratliff, 368 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 14× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (1999). In 2004, the General Assembly amended the statute to require an injured employee to request a benefit review conference.”
Dye v. Witco Corp., 216 S.W.3d 317 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 9× “In 2004, the General Assembly significantly revised Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203. The statute of limitations for workers’ compensation cases is now found at Tennessee Code Annotated 50-6-203(g)(2) (2005).”
In Re: Est. of Martha M. Tanner, 295 S.W.3d 610 (Tenn. 2009). · cites it 4× “§ 47-13-120 (b) (2001); Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-6-203 (b)(1)-(2), 50-6-203(f), 50-6-306(a) (2008); Tenn.”
William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 3× “2012) (“The use of the word ‘shall’ in sections 50-6-203(a) and 50-6-225(a)(l) clearly indicates the legislature’s intention that exhaustion of the benefit review conference process is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a cause of action.”
Davidson v. Lewis Bros. Bakery, 227 S.W.3d 17 (Tenn. 2007). · cites it 3× “On March 15, 2005, the Fund answered, asserting that it was not liable to Employee because the one-year statute of limitation had expired pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203(b)(1) (1999). Further, the Fund ar *19 gued in a pre-trial brief that Tennessee Code…”
Walter Word v. Metro Air Servs., Inc., 377 S.W.3d 671 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 3× “n law allows for either party to file suit — and in potentially different venues: In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement at the benefit review conference as to all issues related to the claim or the benefit review conference process is otherwise exhausted…”
Christopher Furlough v. Spherion Atl. Workforce, LLC, 397 S.W.3d 114 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a)(l) (2008); see also Word, 377 S.”
Carpenter v. State, 838 S.W.2d 525 (Tenn. 1992). · cites it 11× “The only issue we address in this workers’ compensation case is whether incapacitation pay and medical expenses paid by the federal government and Medicaid benefits paid by the state government are “voluntary payments of compensation”, which toll the one-year statute of…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a): 14 cases
Lynch v. City of Jellico, 205 S.W.3d 384 (Tenn. 2006). “See Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a) (“[n]o claim for compensation under [the] Workers’ Compensation Law .”
Lacey Chapman v. Davita, Inc., 380 S.W.3d 710 (Tenn. 2012). “The benefit review conference process is statutorily described as: (a)(1) Notwithstanding any provisions of this chapter to the contrary, in case of a dispute over or failure to agree upon compensation under this chapter, between the employer and employée or the dependent or…”
Dye v. Witco Corp., 216 S.W.3d 317 (Tenn. 2007). “In 2004, the General Assembly significantly revised Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203. The statute of limitations for workers’ compensation cases is now found at Tennessee Code Annotated 50-6-203(g)(2) (2005).”
Lon Cloyd v. Hartco Flooring Co., 274 S.W.3d 638 (Tenn. 2008). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (a) (1999) (emphasis added).”
William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393 (Tenn. 2013). “2012) (“The use of the word ‘shall’ in sections 50-6-203(a) and 50-6-225(a)(l) clearly indicates the legislature’s intention that exhaustion of the benefit review conference process is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a cause of action.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a)(l): 3 cases
William H. Mansell v. Bridgestone Firestone North Am. Tire, LLC, 417 S.W.3d 393 (Tenn. 2013). “2012) (“The use of the word ‘shall’ in sections 50-6-203(a) and 50-6-225(a)(l) clearly indicates the legislature’s intention that exhaustion of the benefit review conference process is a mandatory prerequisite to filing a cause of action.”
Christopher Furlough v. Spherion Atl. Workforce, LLC, 397 S.W.3d 114 (Tenn. 2013). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203(a)(l) (2008); see also Word, 377 S.”
Walter Word v. Metro Air Servs., Inc., 377 S.W.3d 671 (Tenn. 2012). “n law allows for either party to file suit — and in potentially different venues: In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement at the benefit review conference as to all issues related to the claim or the benefit review conference process is otherwise exhausted…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b): 7 cases
Stitts, Vanessa v. ABB Powet Tech, 2017 TN WC 32 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2017).
Crawford, Elsie v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., 2021 TN WC App. 60 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2021).
Bush, Amy v. Stones River Ctr./RHA Health Servs., 2019 TN WC 73 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2019).
Sanders, Sherry v. Sevita Health d/b/a D&S Residential Servs., 2023 TN WC App. 35 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2023).
Oldham, John v. Freeman Webb Co. Realtors d/b/a Sunnybrook, 2024 TN WC App. 41 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2024).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(1): 20 cases
Davidson v. Lewis Bros. Bakery, 227 S.W.3d 17 (Tenn. 2007). “On March 15, 2005, the Fund answered, asserting that it was not liable to Employee because the one-year statute of limitation had expired pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203(b)(1) (1999). Further, the Fund ar *19 gued in a pre-trial brief that Tennessee Code…”
Gerdau Ameristeel, Inc. v. Steven Ratliff, 368 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. 2012). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (1999). In 2004, the General Assembly amended the statute to require an injured employee to request a benefit review conference.”
Julie Geronimo v. Caterpillar Inc., 440 F. App'x 442 (6th Cir. 2011).
Ernstes, Arlene v. Printpack, Inc., 2023 TN WC App. 23 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2023).
Kelso, Roxanna v. Five Star Food Serv., 2016 TN WC 99 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2): 21 cases
Crawford, Elsie v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., 2021 TN WC App. 60 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2021).
Martin, Henry v. Kirby Bldg. Sys., LLC, 2026 TN WC App. 17 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2026).
Taylor, Vincent v. Am. Tire Distributors, 2017 TN WC App. 46 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2017).
Blank, Robert J. v. Estes Express Lines, 2021 TN WC 248 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2021).
Craig, Devontay v. Shimmick Constr. Co., Inc., 2023 TN WC 80 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2023).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(2)(2020): 1 case
Bryant, Joshua v. Malco Theaters, Inc., 2021 TN WC 180 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2021).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(b)(l): 4 cases
In Re: Est. of Martha M. Tanner, 295 S.W.3d 610 (Tenn. 2009). “§ 47-13-120 (b) (2001); Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 50-6-203 (b)(1)-(2), 50-6-203(f), 50-6-306(a) (2008); Tenn.”
Gerdau Ameristeel, Inc. v. Steven Ratliff, 368 S.W.3d 503 (Tenn. 2012). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 50-6-203 (1999). In 2004, the General Assembly amended the statute to require an injured employee to request a benefit review conference.”
Kelso, Roxanna v. Five Star Food Serv., 2016 TN WC App. 26 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2016).
Raine, David v. White Castle, 2016 TN WC 292 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2016).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(c): 4 cases
Vickers, Kimberly v. Amazon, 2019 TN WC 72 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2019).
Moore, Terrence v. YRC, Inc., 2020 TN WC 34 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2020).
Bryant, Joshua v. Malco Theaters, Inc., 2021 TN WC App. 70 (Tenn. Work. Comp. App. Bd. 2021).
Hopson, Cecilia v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Corp., 2022 TN WC 41 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2022).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(d): 1 case
Swanson, Darold v. Facility Installation Serv., 2024 TN WC 29 (Tenn. Ct. Work. Comp. Cl. 2024).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-203(g)(2): 1 case
Bldg. Materials Corp. v. Britt, 211 S.W.3d 706 (Tenn. 2007). “Upon due consideration, we hold that the claim in this matter is not time-barred by the statute of limitations set forth in Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-203 because the statute does not begin to run until the employee is prevented from working due to the employee’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.