Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104 (2026)

Permits and tags - Fees

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 706, s 8, eff. 6/22/2020.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 169, Secs.s 3, s 4eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 169, s 2, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 683, s 1, Sec.s 2eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 398, s 1, eff. 5/18/2017.

Acts 1972, ch. 655, § 4; impl. am. Acts 1972, ch. 829, § 7; 1975, ch. 47, §§ 1, 2; 1976, ch. 431, § 1; 1979, ch. 235, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 54-2604; Acts 1980, ch. 470, § 2; 1983, ch. 133, §1; 2007 , ch. 427, §§ 4- 7; 2008 , ch. 1155, § 2; 2009 , ch. 451, § 1; 2012 , ch. 516, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2021 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Comm'r of the Dep't of Transp. v. Thomas, 336 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
State Ex Rel. Comm'r of the Dep't of Transp. v. Thomas, 336 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 11× “Given the fact that Thomas did not have a permit for the billboard, the State alleged, completion and use of the billboard structure for outdoor advertising would violate the Billboard Regulation and Control Act, specifically Tennessee Code Annotated § 54-21-104. Under the Act,…”
Tennison Bros., Inc. v. William H. Thomas, Jr., 556 S.W.3d 697 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104 (a). TDOT Regulations further provide that no two structures shall be spaced less than 1000 feet apart on the same side of the highway.”
Coe v. City of Sevierville, 21 S.W.3d 237 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “T.C.A. § 54-21-104 requires that signs may not be constructed, erected, operated, used or maintained within 660 feet adjacent to primary highways in Tennessee unless a state permit is obtained.”
Thomas v. Schroer, 116 F. Supp. 3d 869 (W.D. Tenn. 2015). · cites it 3× “This section exempts outdoor advertising of “activities conducted on the property on which they are located” from regulation under § 54-21-104. Similar to the sign code exemptions in Reed, § 107(a)(1) “draws distinctions based on the message a speaker conveys.”
Thomas v. Schroer, 248 F. Supp. 3d 868 (W.D. Tenn. 2017). “§ 54-21-104(a). Some signs, however, may be exempted or qualify as exceptions under the Billboard Act’s location and/or permit and tag restrictions.”
Thomas v. Schroer, 127 F. Supp. 3d 864 (W.D. Tenn. 2015). “For example, § 54-21-104 provides guidelines for issuing licenses and permits based on compliance with § 103 and assuming § 107 does not apply.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. William H. Thomas, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 18× “Thomas did not have a permit for the Crossroads Ford site billboard, the structure violated the Billboard Regulation and Control Act, Tennessee Code Annotated Section 54-21-104.” Id. at 593 . Accordingly, TDOT sought an injunction to stop Mr.”
In re Thomas, 565 B.R. 856 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 2017). · cites it 2× “(“the Billboard Act”); see also Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 54-21-104 , 54-21-105, and 54-21-112.”
Thomas v. Schroer (W.D. Tenn. 2021). · cites it 4× “The Billboard Act’s Permit and Tag Restrictions on Billboards and Signs The Billboard Act further exempted certain billboards and signs from complying with the permit and tag restrictions found in Tennessee Code Annotated Section 54-21-104 (2017). These exemptions were set forth…”
Universal Outdoor, Inc. v. Tennessee Dep't of Transp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104 . It also authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to acquire and remove billboards lawfully in existence under prior law, by purchase, gift or condemnation, and to pay just compensation upon removal.”
William H. Thomas, Jr. v. Tennessee Dep't of Transp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “Because the appeal was still pending, Thomas was acting without a permit, in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104 . Ultimately, the Commissioner of TDOT reversed the First Initial Order from October 2005 granting the permits to Thomas, and ordered the permits to be re-issued…”
William H. Thomas, Jr. v. Tennessee Dep't of Transp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104 (a). Rules promulgated by TDOT require that outdoor advertising “be located in areas zoned for commercial or industrial use or in areas which qualify for unzoned commercial or industrial use.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104(a) — 3 cases
State Ex Rel. Comm'r of the Dep't of Transp. v. Thomas, 336 S.W.3d 588 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “Given the fact that Thomas did not have a permit for the billboard, the State alleged, completion and use of the billboard structure for outdoor advertising would violate the Billboard Regulation and Control Act, specifically Tennessee Code Annotated § 54-21-104. Under the Act,…”
Thomas v. Schroer, 248 F. Supp. 3d 868 (W.D. Tenn. 2017). “§ 54-21-104(a). Some signs, however, may be exempted or qualify as exceptions under the Billboard Act’s location and/or permit and tag restrictions.”
State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. William H. Thomas, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “Thomas did not have a permit for the Crossroads Ford site billboard, the structure violated the Billboard Regulation and Control Act, Tennessee Code Annotated Section 54-21-104.” Id. at 593 . Accordingly, TDOT sought an injunction to stop Mr.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 54-21-104(a)(2) — 1 case
State ex rel. Dep't of Transp. v. William H. Thomas, Jr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2014). “Thomas did not have a permit for the Crossroads Ford site billboard, the structure violated the Billboard Regulation and Control Act, Tennessee Code Annotated Section 54-21-104.” Id. at 593 . Accordingly, TDOT sought an injunction to stop Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.