Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-419 (2026)

Electronic monitoring indigency fund - Account for ignition interlock devices - Account for other monitoring devices - Responsibility for costs to comply with ignition interlock requirements - Indigency

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 464, s 1, eff. 10/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 383, s 6, eff. 10/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 383, s 5, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 114, s 39, eff. 7/1/2023.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 505, s 2, s 3, s 4, s 5, s 6 eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 505, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1046, s 5, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1046, s 7, eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 577, s 1, s 2 eff. 7/1/2018.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 993, s 3, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 993, s 2, eff. 7/1/2016.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 344, s 13, eff. 5/13/2013.

Amended by 2013 Tenn. Acts, ch. 154, s 18, eff. 7/1/2013.

Acts 2005, ch. 483, § 7; 2006, ch. 998, § 2; 2007 , ch. 374, § 2; 2010 , ch. 1020, §§ 1, 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2021 · leading case: State of Tennessee v. Rosemary L. Decosimo (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018).
State of Tennessee v. Rosemary L. Decosimo (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 15× “- 15 - T.C.A. § 55-10-419 (2012) (emphases added).”
State of Tennessee v. Robert Allison Franklin (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). · cites it 12× “T.C.A. § 55-10-419 (2012) (emphases added)5; see id.”
State of Tennessee v. Rosemary L. Decosimo, 555 S.W.3d 494 (2018). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-419 (2006); 2006 Tenn.”
State of Tennessee v. Kelly Brooke Frye (Tenn. Crim. App. 2021). “If the defendant is granted probation on or after July 1, 2016, and the court orders a monitoring device but determines that the person is indigent, the court shall order that the portion of the costs of the device that the person is unable to pay be paid by the electronic…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-419(b)(1) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Rosemary L. Decosimo (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “- 15 - T.C.A. § 55-10-419 (2012) (emphases added).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-419(c)(3) — 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Rosemary L. Decosimo (Tenn. Crim. App. 2018). “- 15 - T.C.A. § 55-10-419 (2012) (emphases added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.