Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-129 (2026)

Fees for reinstatement of license and registration - Installment payment plans

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2022 Tenn. Acts, ch. 788, s 1, eff. 4/8/2022.

Acts 1977, ch. 446, § 29; T.C.A., § 59-1279; Acts 1980, ch. 817, § 6; 1980, ch. 868, § 3; 1986, ch. 842, §§ 25-27; 1998, ch. 682, § 1; 2000, ch. 892, § 1; 2001, ch. 43, § 1; 2006, ch. 569, § 1; 2007 , ch. 317, § 1; 2007 , ch. 484, § 90.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1987–2022 · leading case: Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 4× “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-129 (b). TDSHS is permitted to adopt payment plans for restoration fees in excess of a certain amount set by Purkey.”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 4× “" Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-129 (b). TDSHS is permitted to adopt payment plans for restoration fees in excess of a certain amount set by Purkey.”
Norton v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf. (In Re Norton), 76 B.R. 624 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “§ 55-12-129 (1980 & Supp.1986). There is no legislative explanation why the $65 “restoration” fee was imposed upon pre-revocation bankruptcy debtors and not upon others eligible for avoidance of revocation.”
Clayton v. Tennessee Dep't of Saf. (In re Clayton), 199 B.R. 29 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1996). · cites it 21× “§ 523 (a)(7) 1 of certain statutory fees under Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-12-129, infra, imposed as a precondition to the reinstatement or *31 reissuance of a Tennessee driver’s license to her.”
Marie Hawks v. Michael Greene, Comm. Dept of Saf. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 3× “In apparent recognition of the barrier presented by this comb ination of fees required to obtain a new or reinstated license after revocation, the Genera l Assem bly has authorized reinstatement of a license on an installment payment plan, effective January 1, 2001.”
State of Tennessee v. Marvin Maurice Deberry (2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-129 (e) (2020) (“Fees paid to the department of safety pursuant to this title shall be expendable receipts to be used by the commissioner of safety toward the cost of administering this title.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-129(g): 1 case
Marie Hawks v. Michael Greene, Comm. Dept of Saf. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “In apparent recognition of the barrier presented by this comb ination of fees required to obtain a new or reinstated license after revocation, the Genera l Assem bly has authorized reinstatement of a license on an installment payment plan, effective January 1, 2001.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.