Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103 (2026)

Application for certificate of title - Form and contents - Statement of dealer or bill of sale

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 462, s 1, eff. 7/1/2019.

Acts 1951, ch. 70, § 29 (Williams, § 5538.129); Acts 1953, ch. 167, § 4; 1965, ch. 125, § 1; 1972, ch. 518, § 5; 1973, ch. 234, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 59-303; Acts 1982, ch. 600, § 2; 1984, ch. 559, § 1; 1986, ch. 771, § 1; 1989, ch. 341, § 1; 2006, ch. 952, § 1; 2007 , ch. 289, § 1; 2007 , ch. 484, §§ 11-13; 2009 , ch. 530, §§ 109, 112.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1980–2016 · leading case: Weill v. United Bank of Chattanooga (In Re Poteet), 5 B.R. 631 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980).
Weill v. United Bank of Chattanooga (In Re Poteet), 5 B.R. 631 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980). · cites it 6× “§§ 55-3-103 & 55-3-119. This distinction is also unconvincing.”
Waldschmidt v. Miracle Motors (In Re Haynes), 28 B.R. 136 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1983). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-3-103 (repl. vol. 1980) prescribes the procedure for obtaining a certificate of title when no certificate has previously been issued by the Motor Vehicle Division: 7 (a) Every owner of a vehicle, subject to registration hereunder and for which no certificate…”
Regions Bank v. Bric Constructors, LLC, f/k/a Bric Contractors, LLC, & Patricia McIntosh, 380 S.W.3d 740 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “” They argue that this fact is significant because (1) the certificate of title is flawed because it does not “bear the signature of the owner” (see Section 55-3-103(a)), and (2) the LLC could not pledge as collateral property it did not own.”
Weaver v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re McFarland), 131 B.R. 627 (E.D. Tenn. 1990). · cites it 2× “Finally, to hold otherwise would require a car dealership such as Gary Yeomans to apply for the certificate of title prior to a point in time in which it could advise the Motor Vehicle Division for the State of Tennessee who the lienholder of record is.”
Fruehauf Corp. v. Sexton (In Re Sexton), 18 B.R. 733 (E.D. Tenn. 1982). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-3-103(a). Upon approval of the application, the Division of Motor Vehicles will issue a certificate of title with all liens or encumbrances noted.”
Smith v. Smith, 650 S.W.2d 54 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). “Three of these requests are based on Appellant’s erroneous belief that certificate of title is determinative of ownership; the fourth, which deals with the burden of proof, was contained in the charge of the court. Thus, the court did not err in refusing the special requests.”
Farmer v. Green Tree Servicing LLC (In Re Snelson), 330 B.R. 643 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2005). · cites it 2× “See also Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103 (a), (d) (1997) (requiring owners of vehicles to make application for registration with the county clerk, who "shall act as the agent of the [Department of Safety] in receiving the application for certificate of title[.”
Fruehauf Corp. v. Sexton (In Re Sexton), 18 B.R. 730 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1981). · cites it 5× “” T.C.A. § 55-3-103(a). Among the various items to be listed on this application is a statement of liens or encumbrances.”
Stevenson v. Leisure Guide of Am., Inc. (In Re Shelton Harrison Chevrolet, Inc.), 202 F.3d 834 (6th Cir. 2000). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103 (c) (1998). It is illegal to Shelton derived no added value from the MSOs, its payments drive in Tennessee without a certificate of title.”
In re Tellico Lake Props., L.P., 548 B.R. 800 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2016). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103 . 2 Additionally, a security interest in a motor vehicle is perfected only through notation on the certificate of title; possession and/or control of a vehicle is insufficient.”
McLemore v. Liberty State Bank (In re Johnson), 39 B.R. 478 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1984). · cites it 3× “§ 55-3-103(a) which provides that: (a) Every owner of a vehicle, subject to registration hereunder and for which no certificate of title has ever been issued by the division, shall make application to the county court clerk of the county wherein the vehicle is to be registered.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103(3): 1 case
Weaver v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re McFarland), 131 B.R. 627 (E.D. Tenn. 1990). “Finally, to hold otherwise would require a car dealership such as Gary Yeomans to apply for the certificate of title prior to a point in time in which it could advise the Motor Vehicle Division for the State of Tennessee who the lienholder of record is.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103(a): 6 cases
Regions Bank v. Bric Constructors, LLC, f/k/a Bric Contractors, LLC, & Patricia McIntosh, 380 S.W.3d 740 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). “” They argue that this fact is significant because (1) the certificate of title is flawed because it does not “bear the signature of the owner” (see Section 55-3-103(a)), and (2) the LLC could not pledge as collateral property it did not own.”
Weill v. United Bank of Chattanooga (In Re Poteet), 5 B.R. 631 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980). “§§ 55-3-103 & 55-3-119. This distinction is also unconvincing.”
Fruehauf Corp. v. Sexton (In Re Sexton), 18 B.R. 733 (E.D. Tenn. 1982). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 55-3-103(a). Upon approval of the application, the Division of Motor Vehicles will issue a certificate of title with all liens or encumbrances noted.”
Smith v. Smith, 650 S.W.2d 54 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). “Three of these requests are based on Appellant’s erroneous belief that certificate of title is determinative of ownership; the fourth, which deals with the burden of proof, was contained in the charge of the court. Thus, the court did not err in refusing the special requests.”
Fruehauf Corp. v. Sexton (In Re Sexton), 18 B.R. 730 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1981). “” T.C.A. § 55-3-103(a). Among the various items to be listed on this application is a statement of liens or encumbrances.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103(a)(3): 2 cases
Weill v. United Bank of Chattanooga (In Re Poteet), 5 B.R. 631 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980). “§§ 55-3-103 & 55-3-119. This distinction is also unconvincing.”
Fruehauf Corp. v. Sexton (In Re Sexton), 18 B.R. 730 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1981). “” T.C.A. § 55-3-103(a). Among the various items to be listed on this application is a statement of liens or encumbrances.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-3-103(a)(4): 1 case
Weill v. United Bank of Chattanooga (In Re Poteet), 5 B.R. 631 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 1980). “§§ 55-3-103 & 55-3-119. This distinction is also unconvincing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.