Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106 (2026)

Required identification numbers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1968, ch. 603, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 59-506; Acts 1992, ch. 690, §§ 1, 2; 2004, ch. 513, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1988–2009 · leading case: Paty v. Herb Adcox Chevrolet Co., 756 S.W.2d 697 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988).
Paty v. Herb Adcox Chevrolet Co., 756 S.W.2d 697 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 4× “Although the car was a “new” car under the provisions of T.C.A. § 55-5-106(e)(2), it had been driven as a demonstrator by one of the Defendant’s salesmen and had approximately 3,200 miles on it.”
Rostis Timoshchuk v. Long of Chattanooga Mecedes-Benz, No. E2008-01562-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 3230961 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2009). · cites it 10× “Timoshchuk also contends that the statutory definition of a “new” vehicle found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106 (e)(5)(2008) is irrelevant to the current issue, despite the fact that Tenn.”
Gene Anderson v. Lamb's Auto Serv., Inc., No. W2008-01305-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2009). “§ 55-5-106(e) (1993). -6- to return the property in accord with a contract or returned it in a damaged condition, and 3) the damage was not due to the inherent nature of the property bailed.”
United States v. Proffitt, 843 F. Supp. 350 (M.D. Tenn. 1994). “(2) Any person, firm or corporation required to keep records by §§ 55-5-106— 55-5-110 and willfully failing to do so commits a Class C misdemeanor.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106(e): 1 case
Gene Anderson v. Lamb's Auto Serv., Inc., No. W2008-01305-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2009). “§ 55-5-106(e) (1993). -6- to return the property in accord with a contract or returned it in a damaged condition, and 3) the damage was not due to the inherent nature of the property bailed.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106(e)(2): 1 case
Paty v. Herb Adcox Chevrolet Co., 756 S.W.2d 697 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988). “Although the car was a “new” car under the provisions of T.C.A. § 55-5-106(e)(2), it had been driven as a demonstrator by one of the Defendant’s salesmen and had approximately 3,200 miles on it.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106(e)(5): 1 case
Rostis Timoshchuk v. Long of Chattanooga Mecedes-Benz, No. E2008-01562-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 3230961 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 8, 2009). “Timoshchuk also contends that the statutory definition of a “new” vehicle found in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-5-106 (e)(5)(2008) is irrelevant to the current issue, despite the fact that Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.