Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-9-204 (2026)

Brakes - Equipment required on various type vehicles - Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1937, ch. 245, § 5; C. Supp. 1950, § 2700.16 (Williams, § 2695); Acts 1969, ch. 91, § 1; 1973, ch. 326, § 3; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 59-916; Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 113; 1999, ch. 72, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: Lawson v. Adams, 338 S.W.3d 486 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010).
Lawson v. Adams, 338 S.W.3d 486 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “In his response to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff claimed Defendant violated Tenn.Code Ann. §§ 55-9-204 & 205 (addressing brake requirements for motor vehicles and setting forth many requirements, including that all brakes be maintained in good working order…”
State of Tennessee v. Derrick Jerome Miller (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020). · cites it 10× “Trooper Winningham acknowledged that, under Code section 55-9-204, a farming trailer carrying the same amount of weight as a commercial trailer did not have to be equipped with the same brakes.”
Robert Beaver v. Ford Motor Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “, Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 55-9-204 , 55-9-217, 55-9-405, it did not use this term to categorize the vehicles entitled to protection under the Tennessee Lemon Law.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-9-204(c)(1): 1 case
State of Tennessee v. Derrick Jerome Miller (Tenn. Crim. App. 2020). “Trooper Winningham acknowledged that, under Code section 55-9-204, a farming trailer carrying the same amount of weight as a commercial trailer did not have to be equipped with the same brakes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.