Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-323 (2026)

Proof of claims - When filed - Late filings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1991, ch. 142, § 4.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2001 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001).
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter an order pursuant to TenmCode Ann. § 56-9-327(d) sustaining the receiver’s denial of Dr.”
State., ex. rel. v. United Physicians Ins. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-323 . UPI appointed a Florida attorney named Kenneth Deacon to represent Dr.”
State ex rel. McReynolds v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 914 S.W.2d 491 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “The disposition of late-filed claims is controlled by the provisions of Tenn.Code Ann. § 56-9-323. Under subsections (b) and (c) of that statute, the Receiver may treat such claims as if they were not late, under specific circumstances that the appellant does not claim are…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-9-323(d): 1 case
State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Ins. Risk Retention Grp., 56 S.W.3d 557 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter an order pursuant to TenmCode Ann. § 56-9-327(d) sustaining the receiver’s denial of Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.