Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-27-415 (2026)

Lien for assessments

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 866,s 2, eff. 6/1/2016.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 866,s 1, eff. 6/1/2016.

Acts 2008, ch. 766, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2025 · leading case: Kong v. Chatham Vill. HOA (W.D. Tenn. 2024).
Kong v. Chatham Vill. HOA (W.D. Tenn. 2024). · cites it 11× “Violation of Tenn. Code § 66-27-415 Against Mink and Chatham Village In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff contends that Chatham Village and Mink violated Tenn.”
Kong v. Chatham Vill. HOA (W.D. Tenn. 2025). · cites it 5× “) The last remaining claim is that Chatham Village and Mink wrongfully foreclosed against Plaintiff in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-27-415 by falsifying documents relating to pre-foreclosure notice and by not having a valid public sale.”
Langford Farms Common Facilities Ass'n, Inc. v. Paul A. Clark (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “The complaint sought injunctive relief, relief for breach of contract and enforcement of a lien under Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-27-415 . Mr. Clark filed a two-sentence answer denying all allegations.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-27-415(a)(1): 1 case
Kong v. Chatham Vill. HOA (W.D. Tenn. 2024). “Violation of Tenn. Code § 66-27-415 Against Mink and Chatham Village In the Amended Complaint, Plaintiff contends that Chatham Village and Mink violated Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.