Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (2026)
Withholding of retainage - Violations - Penalties
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) All construction contracts on any project in this state, both public and private, may provide for the withholding of retainage; provided, however, that the retainage amount may not exceed five percent (5%) of the amount of the contract.
- (b) The owner, whether public or private, shall release and pay all retainages for work completed pursuant to the terms of any contract to the prime contractor within ninety (90) days after completion of the work or within ninety (90) days after substantial completion of the project for work completed, whichever occurs first. As used in this subsection (b), "work completed" means the completion of the scope of the work and all terms and conditions covered by the contract under which the retainage is being held. The prime contractor shall pay all retainages due any remote contractor within ten (10) days after receipt of the retainages from the owner. Any remote contractor receiving the retainage from the prime contractor shall pay to any lower-tier remote contractor all retainages due the lower-tier remote contractor within ten (10) days after receipt of the retainages.
- (c) Any default in the making of the payments is subject to those remedies provided in this part.
- (d) If an owner or prime contractor withholds retainage that is for the use and benefit of the prime contractor or its remote contractors pursuant to § 66-34-104(a) and (b), then neither the prime contractor nor any of its remote contractors are required to deposit additional retained funds into an escrow account in accordance with § 66-34-104(a) and (b).
- (e)
- (1) It is an offense for a person, firm, or corporation to fail to comply with subsection (a) or (b) or § 66-34-104(a).
- (2)
- (A) A violation of this subsection (e) is a Class A misdemeanor, subject to a fine only of three thousand dollars ($3,000).
- (B) Each day a person, firm, or corporation fails to comply with subsection (a) or (b) or § 66-34-104(a) is a separate violation of this subsection (e).
- (C) Until the violation of this subsection (e) is remediated by compliance, the punishment for each violation is consecutive to all other violations.
- (3) In addition to the fine imposed pursuant to subdivisions (e)(2)(A) and (B), the court shall order restitution be made to the owner of the retained funds. In determining the appropriate amount of restitution, the formula stated in § 40-35-304 must be used.
- (4) This subsection (e) does not apply to the state, any department, board, or agency thereof, including the University of Tennessee, all counties and municipalities, and all departments, boards, or agencies thereof, including all school and education boards, and any other subdivision of the state.
Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 749, s 16, eff. 7/1/2020.
Acts 2007 , ch. 201, § 3; 2008 , ch. 804, § 3; 2012 , ch. 609, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2013–2022 · leading case: Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016).
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Beacon4’s lien claim against I & L consists essentially of two parts: (1) a retainage withheld by I & L for work that the parties agree Beacon4 completed within the scope of the Site Contract, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (providing for the withholding of a retainage of…”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (2021). “, Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (d). 8 The parties also continued to dispute Holladay’s liability for Snake Steel’s attorney fees and costs.”
Aarene Contracting, LLC v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a). Krispy Kreme was also required to create a separate escrow account with a third party for retained amounts.”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a); Snake Steel, Inc.”
Fed. Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Relyant Global LLC (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (2017) (emphasis added).”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a). When the prime contract is $500,000 or greater, as was the case here, the PPA mandates that all retained amounts “shall be deposited in a separate, interest- bearing, escrow account with a third party which must be established upon the…”
Twin K Constr., Inc. v. UMA, Geotechnical Constr., Inc. (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-303 ; see also Tenn.”
James G. Akers v. Sessions Paving Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “”); - 201 (“Performance by a contractor in accordance with the provisions of a written contract with an owner . . . .”); -301 (“Performance by a subcontractor, materialman or furnisher in accordance with the provisions of such person’s written contract with a contractor .”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 66-34-103(a) (2015). Here, the trial court properly concluded that the escrow provision of the Prompt Pay Act did not apply.”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC - Concurring (2021). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (b). Notably, section -103(b) contains no language requiring the prime contractor to deposit such retainages into a separate, interest-bearing escrow account upon receipt from the owner.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103(a): 2 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Beacon4’s lien claim against I & L consists essentially of two parts: (1) a retainage withheld by I & L for work that the parties agree Beacon4 completed within the scope of the Site Contract, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (providing for the withholding of a retainage of…”
Vic Davis Constr., Inc. v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2019). “§ 66-34-103(a) (2015). Here, the trial court properly concluded that the escrow provision of the Prompt Pay Act did not apply.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103(b): 2 cases
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Beacon4’s lien claim against I & L consists essentially of two parts: (1) a retainage withheld by I & L for work that the parties agree Beacon4 completed within the scope of the Site Contract, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (providing for the withholding of a retainage of…”
Snake Steel, Inc. v. Holladay Constr. Grp., LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a). When the prime contract is $500,000 or greater, as was the case here, the PPA mandates that all retained amounts “shall be deposited in a separate, interest- bearing, escrow account with a third party which must be established upon the…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103(e): 1 case
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Beacon4’s lien claim against I & L consists essentially of two parts: (1) a retainage withheld by I & L for work that the parties agree Beacon4 completed within the scope of the Site Contract, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (providing for the withholding of a retainage of…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103(e)(3): 1 case
Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLC, 514 S.W.3d 153 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2016). “Beacon4’s lien claim against I & L consists essentially of two parts: (1) a retainage withheld by I & L for work that the parties agree Beacon4 completed within the scope of the Site Contract, see Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-34-103 (a) (providing for the withholding of a retainage of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.