Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-5-103 (2026)

Forms of conveyances

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The following or other equivalent forms, varied to suit the precise state of facts, are sufficient for the purposes contemplated, without further circumlocution:

Code 1858, § 2013; Shan., § 3680; Code 1932, § 7607; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 64-502.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 2012).
R. Douglas Hughes v. New Life Dev. Corp., 387 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 2012). · cites it 2× “Thus, in contrast to the Work Product Documents, the real property described in the Purchase and Sale Agreement was actually conveyed by execution of the deed so as to satisfy various statutory requirements.”
ABN AMRO Mortg. Grp., Inc. v. S. Sec. Fed. Credit Union, 372 S.W.3d 121 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-5-103. The question, then, is whether a description and, in this case, a description that contains an error is sufficient to satisfy this requirement.”
In re Lady Bug Corp., 500 B.R. 556 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-5-103(2). The quitclaim deed by which Ms.”
CC Holdings (Tennessee), Inc. v. Tennessee Gas Transp., Inc. (In Re Tennessee Gas Transp., Inc.), 169 B.R. 643 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn. 1994). “The sole issue before the court at this time is the validity and enforceability of the Feinsod and DeBlasio deeds of trust which were recorded prior to plaintiffs deed of trust.”
Johnson v. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB as Tr. fo (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2020). · cites it 4× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-5-103 ; see also Jahn v.”
Nena Proffitt Valentine v. Fred Holt (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Janeway responds that, because this language in the deed does not designate Polly Place with reasonable certainty, the trial court properly concluded that the 2010 deed did not convey the property.”
Arlie Bingham v. John Doles (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 2× “We first note that section 66-5-103 of the Tennessee Code recognizes the validity of quitclaim deeds as a proper form of conveyance.”
Sandra Lynn Hobbs v. Lisa Hobbs Nottingham (Tenn. Ct. App. 2015). “cannot have a partition line imposed upon them “post-contracting” as such a partition would create an “estate of property” that was not bargained for; At the current time a deed comporting with T.C.A. 66-5-103 cannot be created as to the contract .”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 66-5-103(2): 1 case
In re Lady Bug Corp., 500 B.R. 556 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 66-5-103(2). The quitclaim deed by which Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.