Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (2026)

Tax imposed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 261, s 2, eff. 4/30/2019.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 531, s 1, eff. 2/1/2016.

Acts 1981, ch. 488, § 1; 1982, ch. 725, § 1; 1983, ch. 426, § 1; 1983, ch. 449, §§ 1, 2, 4; T.C.A., § 67-4102, Item J; Acts 1986, ch. 873, § 1; 1988, ch. 1024, § 1; 1989, ch. 546, §§ 1, 2; 1992, ch. 529, § 7; 1995, ch. 550, § 1; 1998, ch. 901, § 1; 1999, ch. 502, § 1; 2000, ch. 770, § 1; 2000, ch. 845, § 1; 2001, ch. 454, §§ 5 - 8; 2004, ch. 914, § 6(g); 2005, ch. 429, § 24; 2006, ch. 1019, §§ 46, 47; 2009 , ch. 488, § 1; 2012, ch. 1052, §§ 2, 3; 2012, ch. 1056, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018).
Thomas v. Haslam, 303 F. Supp. 3d 585 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 6× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 . For example, "[t]here is levied a privilege tax on litigation of seventeen dollars and seventy-five cents ($17.”
Thomas v. Haslam, 329 F. Supp. 3d 475 (M.D. Tenn. 2018). · cites it 8× “§ 40-25-123 (a) ; Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (a). If the defendant does not pay these fines, costs, and litigation taxes-also known as "court debt"-then local authorities can attempt to collect on the debt using the ordinary tools available to judgment creditors, such as…”
Wilma Griffin v. Campbell Clinic, P.A., 439 S.W.3d 899 (Tenn. 2014). “§ 67-4-602(b) (2013) (imposing “a privilege tax of twenty-three dollars and seventy-five cents .”
Lamar Fletcher v. State of Tennessee, 9 S.W.3d 103 (Tenn. 1999). · cites it 2× “In this appeal we address two primary issues: (1) whether an indigent party is liable for payment of outstanding litigation taxes levied under Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-4-602 (1998), and (2) whether the Tennessee Department of Correction had authority to withdraw money…”
Jabari Issa Mandela a/k/a John Wooden v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (b). Here, the court clerk appears to have divided this fee into three separate costs: (1) a $19.”
State of Tennessee v. Leslie E. Raymond (Tenn. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “In addition, various litigation taxes are levied on criminal charges in cases instituted in the city, county, and state courts pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 67-4-602. Section 67-4-603, in turn, provides for the collection by the clerks of the various courts of the…”
Scott M. Craig v. David Mills, Warden - NOT FOR Pub. (Tenn. 2011). · cites it 2× “See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 67-4-602 to -604 (2006 & Supp.”
Marvin Bernatsky & Patricia Bernatsky v. Designer Baths & Kitchens, LLC - Concurring Opinion (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “§27-5-103 (providing that litigants appealing from General Sessions Court must post a bond for the “costs of the appeal”); Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (b) (requiring litigants in General Sessions Court and Circuit Court to pay a “privilege tax on litigation”).”
Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Joseph H. Johnston (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “00 is the state litigation tax, required by Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (g)(1). The fine did not exceed $50.”
Lamar Fletcher v. TN Claims Comm. (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “Fletcher focuses on Tennessee Code Annotated § 20-12- 3 Tennessee Code Annotated § 9-8-403 provides that the Claims Commission shall maintain two separate dockets, a small claims docket and a regular docket similar to those maintained by courts of record.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602(b): 2 cases
Wilma Griffin v. Campbell Clinic, P.A., 439 S.W.3d 899 (Tenn. 2014). “§ 67-4-602(b) (2013) (imposing “a privilege tax of twenty-three dollars and seventy-five cents .”
Jabari Issa Mandela a/k/a John Wooden v. Tennessee Dep't of Corr. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-4-602 (b). Here, the court clerk appears to have divided this fee into three separate costs: (1) a $19.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.