Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ current as of May 2026
Repealed by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 184,s 2, eff. 7/1/2023.
Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 63, s 5, eff. 3/28/2019.
Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 938, s 2, eff. 4/27/2016.
Acts 1973, ch. 226, § 10; 1975, ch. 171, § 1; 1979, ch. 64, §§ 1, 2; 1980, ch. 467, § 1; 1983, ch. 237, § 1; T.C.A., § 67-831; Acts 1986, ch. 749, § 19; 1995, ch. 305, § 126; 1997 , ch. 160, § 7; 2007 , ch. 482, § 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Thomas v. State Bd. of Equalization, 940 S.W.2d 563 (Tenn. 1997).
Thomas v. State Bd. of Equalization, 940 S.W.2d 563 (Tenn. 1997). “If the taxpayer is unsuccessful and the recommendation of the administrative judge is accepted, the taxpayer may appeal the commission’s decision to the state board; however, the statute also provides that the decision of the commission is subject to judicial review, Tenn.Code…”
Willamette Indus., Inc. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 11 S.W.3d 142 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “” T.C.A. § 67-5-1502(a). The AAC’s order in the instant case fixed, for ad valorem tax purposes, the separate values of 15 parcels of Wayne County woodland owned by the petitioner, Willamette Industries, Inc.”
Joseph Heintz v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1506 (b). A party could then appeal the AAC’s decision to the SBOE within 15 days, Tenn.”
Batson East-Land Co, Inc. v. Ronnie D. Boyd, 4 S.W.3d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “See T.C.A. § 67-5-1502(j)(l) (1989) (providing that action taken by Assessment Appeals Commission shall be final unless State Board of Equalization requires review of action within forty-five days).”
Williamson Cnty., Tennessee v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2023). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502 (a) (Supp. 2017).”
In Re TWT Acquisition, LLC Prop. ID: 003 009.04 Tax Years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502 (j) (Supp. 2021).”
In Re All Assessments, Review of Ad Valorem Assessments of Pub. Util. Companies for Tax Year 1998, 62 S.W.3d 165 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). “That statute provides, in relevant part: (a) Upon its consideration of reports made to it, together with the evidence submitted therewith or other information available, the state board or the assessment appeals commission, if such has been created by the state board under §…”
In the Matter of All Assessments (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “-- (a) Upon its consideration of reports made to it, together with the evidence submitted therewith or other information available, the state board or the assessment appeals commission, if such has been created by the state board under § 67-5-1502, shall take whatever steps it…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502(a) — 1 case
Willamette Indus., Inc. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Comm'n, 11 S.W.3d 142 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999). “” T.C.A. § 67-5-1502(a). The AAC’s order in the instant case fixed, for ad valorem tax purposes, the separate values of 15 parcels of Wayne County woodland owned by the petitioner, Willamette Industries, Inc.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502(j)(l) — 1 case
Batson East-Land Co, Inc. v. Ronnie D. Boyd, 4 S.W.3d 185 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). “See T.C.A. § 67-5-1502(j)(l) (1989) (providing that action taken by Assessment Appeals Commission shall be final unless State Board of Equalization requires review of action within forty-five days).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1502(k) — 2 cases
Thomas v. State Bd. of Equalization, 940 S.W.2d 563 (Tenn. 1997). “If the taxpayer is unsuccessful and the recommendation of the administrative judge is accepted, the taxpayer may appeal the commission’s decision to the state board; however, the statute also provides that the decision of the commission is subject to judicial review, Tenn.Code…”
Joseph Heintz v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-1506 (b). A party could then appeal the AAC’s decision to the SBOE within 15 days, Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.