Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of classification and assessment of property:

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 781,s 2, eff. 4/23/2024.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 490, Secs.s 1, s 2 eff. 6/6/2017.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 351, s 1, eff. 5/11/2017.

Acts 1973, ch. 226, § 6; 1974, ch. 467, §§ 2, 3; 1982, ch. 774, §§ 1, 2; T.C.A., § 67-601; Acts 1984, ch. 832, § 5; 1989, ch. 312, § 3; 1995, ch. 305, § 121; 1997 , ch. 109, § 1; 1999, ch. 198, § 1; 2000, ch. 571, § 2; 2004, ch. 719, § 1; 2006, ch. 521, § 1.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008).
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). · cites it 9× “On May 18, 2004, the General Assembly, by the enactment of chapter 719 of the 2004 Public Acts, amended Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-501, modifying the definition of real property to include [mjains, pipes, pipelines and tanks permitted or authorized to be built, laid…”
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 231 F.R.D. 518 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). · cites it 15× “Plaintiff seeks to enjoin permanently: (1) the allegedly unconstitutional application or enforcement of Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee State Constitution and Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (9), as amended by Act of May 18, 2004, ch.”
Fed. Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 10× “Thus a company transporting packages on an expedited basis as a common carrier must be deemed to be an express company which falls within the definition of a “public utility” for purposes of T.C.A. § 67-5-501. Federal Express also argues that to assess its property for ad…”
Union Carbide Corp. v. Alexander, 679 S.W.2d 938 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 6× “We granted Defendants’ Rule 11 application to consider the taxability, under Tennessee’s real property taxation statutes, T.C.A. § 67-5-501 et seq., of property owned by the United States in Anderson County, Tennessee.”
Castlewood, Inc. v. Anderson Cnty., 969 S.W.2d 908 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 4× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-501(10)(1994). Neither the constitution, these statutes, nor the Horizontal Property Act makes any specific reference to the classification of condominium property for taxation purposes.”
Dan Bennett v. CMH Homes, Inc., 770 F.3d 511 (6th Cir. 2014). “Tenn. Code § 67-5-501(9)(A) (defining “real property” to include fixtures).”
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. TN State Bd. Of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 20× “Having considered the company’s arguments that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (10)(B)(iii) has been inconsistently applied, we affirm the Board’s decision.”
In Re Est. of James A. Price (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 8× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (5) (emphases added).”
Fam. Trust Servs. LLC v. Green Wise Homes LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 6× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (13) (2022) (within chapter respecting property taxes).”
Throneberry Props. v. Allen, 987 S.W.2d 37 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-501 also furthers the constitutional purpose by providing: All real property which is used, or held for use, for dwelling purposes which contains two (2) or more rental units is hereby defined and shall be classified as "industrial and commercial property-””
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Darrell McEachron (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 5× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (6). The term “assess” has two meanings: (1) “to value for taxation” and (2) “to determine and impose a tax”.”
Malco Theaters, Inc. v. Richard H. Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 4× “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (12) (2006). The court reasoned movie license fees were intangible because “their value does not arise from the ‘article,’ i.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(10)(1994): 1 case
Castlewood, Inc. v. Anderson Cnty., 969 S.W.2d 908 (Tenn. 1998). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-501(10)(1994). Neither the constitution, these statutes, nor the Horizontal Property Act makes any specific reference to the classification of condominium property for taxation purposes.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(10)(B)(iii): 1 case
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. TN State Bd. Of Equalization (Tenn. Ct. App. 2021). “Having considered the company’s arguments that Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (10)(B)(iii) has been inconsistently applied, we affirm the Board’s decision.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(2): 1 case
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(4)(1994): 1 case
Castlewood, Inc. v. Anderson Cnty., 969 S.W.2d 908 (Tenn. 1998). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-5-501(10)(1994). Neither the constitution, these statutes, nor the Horizontal Property Act makes any specific reference to the classification of condominium property for taxation purposes.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(5): 1 case
In Re Est. of James A. Price (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (5) (emphases added).”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(8): 1 case
Fed. Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn. 1986). “Thus a company transporting packages on an expedited basis as a common carrier must be deemed to be an express company which falls within the definition of a “public utility” for purposes of T.C.A. § 67-5-501. Federal Express also argues that to assess its property for ad…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(8)(F): 1 case
Fed. Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn. 1986). “Thus a company transporting packages on an expedited basis as a common carrier must be deemed to be an express company which falls within the definition of a “public utility” for purposes of T.C.A. § 67-5-501. Federal Express also argues that to assess its property for ad…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(8)(G): 2 cases
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). “On May 18, 2004, the General Assembly, by the enactment of chapter 719 of the 2004 Public Acts, amended Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-501, modifying the definition of real property to include [mjains, pipes, pipelines and tanks permitted or authorized to be built, laid…”
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 231 F.R.D. 518 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). “Plaintiff seeks to enjoin permanently: (1) the allegedly unconstitutional application or enforcement of Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee State Constitution and Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (9), as amended by Act of May 18, 2004, ch.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(8)(M): 1 case
Fed. Express Corp. v. Tennessee State Bd. of Equalization, 717 S.W.2d 873 (Tenn. 1986). “Thus a company transporting packages on an expedited basis as a common carrier must be deemed to be an express company which falls within the definition of a “public utility” for purposes of T.C.A. § 67-5-501. Federal Express also argues that to assess its property for ad…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(9): 3 cases
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). “On May 18, 2004, the General Assembly, by the enactment of chapter 719 of the 2004 Public Acts, amended Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-501, modifying the definition of real property to include [mjains, pipes, pipelines and tanks permitted or authorized to be built, laid…”
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 231 F.R.D. 518 (M.D. Tenn. 2005). “Plaintiff seeks to enjoin permanently: (1) the allegedly unconstitutional application or enforcement of Article II, Section 28 of the Tennessee State Constitution and Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501 (9), as amended by Act of May 18, 2004, ch.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(9)(A): 2 cases
Dan Bennett v. CMH Homes, Inc., 770 F.3d 511 (6th Cir. 2014). “Tenn. Code § 67-5-501(9)(A) (defining “real property” to include fixtures).”
In re Young, 471 B.R. 715 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. 2012).
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-5-501(9)(B)(iii): 1 case
Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Morgan, 263 S.W.3d 827 (Tenn. 2008). “On May 18, 2004, the General Assembly, by the enactment of chapter 719 of the 2004 Public Acts, amended Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-5-501, modifying the definition of real property to include [mjains, pipes, pipelines and tanks permitted or authorized to be built, laid…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.