Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-313 (2026)

Interstate commerce - Repair services - Tax credit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 285, s 2, eff. 4/30/2021.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 157, s 1, eff. 4/23/2019.

Acts 1947, ch. 3, § 4; C. Supp. 1950, § 1248.56 (Williams, § 1328.25); T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 67-3007; Acts 1985, ch. 420, § 1; 1986, ch. 518, § 1; 1986, ch. 805, § 1; 1987, ch. 294, § 1; 1987, ch. 433, § 1; 1989, ch. 312, § 6; 1989, ch. 430, § 3; 1993, ch. 318, § 1; 1995, ch. 80, § 1; 1996, ch. 807, § 1; 1997 , ch. 209, § 1; 1997 , ch. 238, § 1; 2003 , ch. 357, § 80; 2004, ch. 724, § 1; 2004, ch. 959, §§ 10, 68; 2005, ch. 311, §§ 1, 2; 2007 , ch. 602, §§ 51, 149; 2009 , ch. 530, § 35; 2011 , ch. 72, § 1; 2012, ch. 1078, § 1; 2013 , ch. 480, § 1; 2015 , ch. 48, §§ 1 - 2; 2015 , ch. 273, § 3; 2015 , ch. 506, § 2.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1985–2019 · leading case: Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston, 835 S.W.2d 576 (Tenn. 1992).
Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston, 835 S.W.2d 576 (Tenn. 1992). · cites it 17× “” The taxpayer challenged the Commissioner’s assessment on the grounds (1) that the sales were to out-of-state customers, and therefore, not sales at retail “in this state;” and (2) that it manufactured, rather than installed, the truck bodies for the out-of-state customers, and…”
Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop. v. Jackson, 740 S.W.2d 413 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 11× “Appellant contends the advertising materials are exempt from sales tax under T.C.A. § 67-6-313 and under this court’s decision in Beecham Laboratories v.”
LeTourneau Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Olsen, 691 S.W.2d 531 (Tenn. 1985). · cites it 12× “, and whether the tax sought to be imposed is in violation of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution and T.C.A. § 67-6-313 as an unconstitutional burden upon interstate commerce.”
Sec. Fire Prot. Co. v. Huddleston, 138 S.W.3d 829 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 11× “We next address Security Fire’s assertion that Rule 8 conflicts with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-313 (a). Rule 8 provides for the imposition of tax on materials purchased in Tennessee on a certificate of resale but then used by the contractor in *840 his business, regardless or…”
JC Penney Co., Inc. v. Olsen, 796 S.W.2d 943 (Tenn. 1990). · cites it 6× “§ 67-3007 [T.C.A. § 67-6-313] exempted the transaction from taxation.”
NASCO, Inc. v. Jackson, 748 S.W.2d 193 (Tenn. 1988). · cites it 4× “Appellant claims exemption under the provisions of T.C.A. § 67-6-313(a) which provides: “It is not the intention of this chapter to levy a tax upon articles of tangible personal property imported into this state or produced or manufactured in this state for export; .”
Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Johnson, 56 S.W.3d 502 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 10× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-6-313(a) (1994). Citing this provision, American Airlines contends that the aviation fuel that remained in its aircraft after the aircraft left the state of Tennessee was being exported and, thus, was exempt from taxation under the import-for-export…”
Colemill Enter., Inc. v. Huddleston, 967 S.W.2d 753 (Tenn. 1998). · cites it 6× “” However, a taxpayer’s being a “manufacturer” is not a prerequisite for the application of Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-313 (a). This statute applies, when the export requirement is met, to items of tangible personal property that are (i) imported into this state, (ii) produced in…”
Hearthstone, Inc. v. Moyers, 809 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 4× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-6-313(a) (emphasis added).”
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Woods, 708 S.W.2d 374 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Sears also complains that the imposition of the use tax violates TCA § 67-6-313 which provides that it is not the intention of the sales and use tax chapter to levy a tax on “bona fide interstate commerce.”
Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Huddleston, 507 U.S. 60 (1993). “Tenn. Code Ann. §67-6-313 (f) (1989). By these measures, Tennessee’s sales tax reduces, if not eliminates, the risk of multiple international taxation.”
Serv. Merch. Co. v. Jackson, 735 S.W.2d 443 (Tenn. 1987). · cites it 2× “While recognizing the surface applicability of Vector, plaintiff insists that, unlike the planes that were subject to the use tax in that case, its airplane had entered the stream of interstate commerce before coming to Tennessee and was therefore not subject to the use tax.”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-313(a) — 10 cases
Eusco, Inc. v. Huddleston, 835 S.W.2d 576 (Tenn. 1992). “” The taxpayer challenged the Commissioner’s assessment on the grounds (1) that the sales were to out-of-state customers, and therefore, not sales at retail “in this state;” and (2) that it manufactured, rather than installed, the truck bodies for the out-of-state customers, and…”
Sec. Fire Prot. Co. v. Huddleston, 138 S.W.3d 829 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “We next address Security Fire’s assertion that Rule 8 conflicts with Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-313 (a). Rule 8 provides for the imposition of tax on materials purchased in Tennessee on a certificate of resale but then used by the contractor in *840 his business, regardless or…”
NASCO, Inc. v. Jackson, 748 S.W.2d 193 (Tenn. 1988). “Appellant claims exemption under the provisions of T.C.A. § 67-6-313(a) which provides: “It is not the intention of this chapter to levy a tax upon articles of tangible personal property imported into this state or produced or manufactured in this state for export; .”
Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Johnson, 56 S.W.3d 502 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-6-313(a) (1994). Citing this provision, American Airlines contends that the aviation fuel that remained in its aircraft after the aircraft left the state of Tennessee was being exported and, thus, was exempt from taxation under the import-for-export…”
Hearthstone, Inc. v. Moyers, 809 S.W.2d 888 (Tenn. 1991). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-6-313(a) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.