Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-314 (2026)

Medical equipment and devices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

There is exempt from the sales or use tax imposed by this chapter:

Amended by 2015 Tenn. Acts, ch. 274,s 1, eff. 7/1/2015.

Acts 1947, ch. 3, § 6; 1949, ch. 245, § 2; C. Supp. 1950, § 1248.61 (Williams, § 1328.27); Acts 1955, ch. 51, § 6; 1955, ch. 194, § 1; 1955, ch. 340, §§ 1, 2; 1961, ch. 248, § 1; 1963, ch. 38, § 4; 1963, ch. 112, § 1; 1963, ch. 137, § 1; 1963, ch. 268, § 1; 1965, ch. 32, § 1; 1965, ch. 164, § 1; 1967, ch. 98, § 1; 1969, ch. 2, § 1; 1971, ch. 39, § 1; 1971, ch. 113, § 1; 1971, ch. 258, § 1; 1973, ch. 173, § 1; 1976, ch. 466, § 2; 1976, ch. 524, § 1; 1976, ch. 689, § 1; 1976, ch. 711, § 1; 1976, ch. 733, § 1; 1977, ch. 79, § 1; 1977, ch. 150, § 1; 1977, ch. 268, § 1; 1977, ch. 487, § 1; 1978, ch. 732, § 1; 1978, ch. 733, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 761, § 116; Acts 1978, ch. 793, § 1; 1978, ch. 831, § 1; 1978, ch. 832, § 1; 1978, ch. 921, § 4; 1979, ch. 191, § 1; 1979, ch. 239, § 1; 1979, ch. 330, § 1; 1979, ch. 338, § 1; 1979, ch. 349, § 1; 1979, ch. 387, § 1; 1979, ch. 391, §§ 1, 2; 1980, ch. 613, § 1; 1980, ch. 748, § 1; 1980, ch. 863, § 1; 1981, ch. 70, § 1; 1981, ch. 133, § 1; 1981, ch. 273, § 1; 1982, ch. 576, § 1; 1982, ch. 634, § 1; 1983, ch. 102, § 3; 1983, ch. 140, § 1; 1983, ch. 162, § 2; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 67-3012; Acts 1995, ch. 144, § 1; 1995, ch. 230, § 1; 1998, ch. 766, § 1; 2003, ch. 357, § 40; 2004, ch. 959, §§ 11, 68; 2005, ch. 311, §§ 1, 2; 2007, ch. 602, §§ 51, 89; 2008, ch. 1106, § 7.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1988–2010 · leading case: Cordis Corp. v. Taylor, 762 S.W.2d 138 (Tenn. 1988).
Cordis Corp. v. Taylor, 762 S.W.2d 138 (Tenn. 1988). · cites it 6× “Cordis did not collect or pay the Tennessee sales tax on the sales on the ground that the devices sold were exempt from sales tax under T.C.A. § 67-6-314(5), which exempts from tax the “sale of pros-thetics, orthotics, special molded orthopedic *139 shoes, walkers, crutches,…”
Nutritional Support Servs., Ltd. v. Taylor, 803 S.W.2d 213 (Tenn. 1991). · cites it 2× “, and other similar medical corrective or support devices, as provided in T.C.A. § 67-6-314(5) and the exemption in T.”
Am. Cyanamid Co. v. Huddleston, 908 S.W.2d 396 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “Title 67, Chapter 6, Part 3 contains a series of exemptions from the Sales and Use Tax, such as blood and blood plasma (Section 67-6-304), insulin (Section 67-6-312), medical equipment and devices for handicapped persons (Section 67-6-314), optical services and equipment…”
Maxwell Med., Inc. v. Chumley, 282 S.W.3d 893 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 67-6-314(5). The motions were argued on August 18, 2006, and the Court took the matter under advisement and issued a Memorandum Opinion on June 5, 2007 and entered Final Judgment in favor of defendant against appellant.”
Maxwell Med., Inc., Successor in Interest to Maxwell Med., LLC v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 12× “esents the following issue for our review: Whether the trial court erred in finding that glucometers and related components, devices used to replace or augment the glucose monitoring and measuring function in the body and as part of a system to “imitate a properly functioning…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-314(5): 4 cases
Cordis Corp. v. Taylor, 762 S.W.2d 138 (Tenn. 1988). “Cordis did not collect or pay the Tennessee sales tax on the sales on the ground that the devices sold were exempt from sales tax under T.C.A. § 67-6-314(5), which exempts from tax the “sale of pros-thetics, orthotics, special molded orthopedic *139 shoes, walkers, crutches,…”
Nutritional Support Servs., Ltd. v. Taylor, 803 S.W.2d 213 (Tenn. 1991). “, and other similar medical corrective or support devices, as provided in T.C.A. § 67-6-314(5) and the exemption in T.”
Maxwell Med., Inc. v. Chumley, 282 S.W.3d 893 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “§ 67-6-314(5). The motions were argued on August 18, 2006, and the Court took the matter under advisement and issued a Memorandum Opinion on June 5, 2007 and entered Final Judgment in favor of defendant against appellant.”
Maxwell Med., Inc., Successor in Interest to Maxwell Med., LLC v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “esents the following issue for our review: Whether the trial court erred in finding that glucometers and related components, devices used to replace or augment the glucose monitoring and measuring function in the body and as part of a system to “imitate a properly functioning…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-6-314(5)(1998): 1 case
Maxwell Med., Inc., Successor in Interest to Maxwell Med., LLC v. Loren L. Chumley, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010). “esents the following issue for our review: Whether the trial court erred in finding that glucometers and related components, devices used to replace or augment the glucose monitoring and measuring function in the body and as part of a system to “imitate a properly functioning…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.