Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-8-412 (2026)

[Not applicable to decedents who die in 2016 or after, see section 67-8-425.] Basis of appraisal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Acts 1929 (Ex. Sess.), ch. 29, § 3(6); Code 1932, § 1278; Acts 1971, ch. 118, § 5; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 686, §§ 1, 5; Acts 1978, ch. 731, § 11; 1983, ch. 73, § 8; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 30-1621; Acts 1985, ch. 364, § 8; 1985, ch. 453, § 3.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1984–2005 · leading case: Franklin Capital Assocs., L.P. v. Almost Fam., Inc., 194 S.W.3d 392 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005).
Franklin Capital Assocs., L.P. v. Almost Fam., Inc., 194 S.W.3d 392 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “Paul Mallarkey, an expert witness called by Caretenders, testified that the block discount measures the effect on the price per share.”
Union Planters Nat'l Bank v. Dedman, 86 S.W.3d 515 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-8-412. Since the taxable value date of the estate for inheritance tax purposes is the date of death, it seems consistent to find that the residuary charged with paying those taxes should be the residuary as valued on the same date, the date of death.”
Mercy v. Olsen, 672 S.W.2d 196 (Tenn. 1984). · cites it 2× “, § 30-1621 (now T.C.A., § 67-8-412), is dispositive of this issue.”
Franklin Capital Assocs., L.P. v. Almost Fam., Inc. f/k/a Caretenders Health Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “1969); see also Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-8-412 (2003). After determining the price per share of Caretenders’ stock, the trial court considered uncontroverted testimony as to the impact of 890,349 shares on the market value of the shares.”
Franklin Capital Assocs., L.P. v. Almost Fam., Inc. f/k/a Caretenders Health Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “1969); see also, Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-8-412 (2003). 10 “Thinly traded” stock is stock that is traded infrequently and/or in low volumes.”
Union Planters v. Bettye Dedman (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 2× “Since the taxable value date of the estate for inheritance tax purposes is the date of death, it seems consistent to find that the residuary charged with paying those taxes should be the residuary as valued on the same date, the date of death. Coupled with the assignment of…”
Grantham v. State of Tennessee Bd. of Equalization, 824 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-8-412(a). So far as we can tell, this is the first case in this jurisdiction dealing with the value of *173 stock in a closely held corporation where the stock is subject to an option at less than the “full and true” value.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 67-8-412(a): 1 case
Grantham v. State of Tennessee Bd. of Equalization, 824 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1991). “” Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-8-412(a). So far as we can tell, this is the first case in this jurisdiction dealing with the value of *173 stock in a closely held corporation where the stock is subject to an option at less than the “full and true” value.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.