Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108 (2026)

Permits

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 771,s 8, eff. 10/1/2024.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 342, s 1, eff. 5/5/2023.

Amended by 2023 Tenn. Acts, ch. 85, s 1, eff. 3/31/2023.

Amended by 2021 Tenn. Acts, ch. 208, s 1, eff. 4/22/2021.

Amended by 2020 Tenn. Acts, ch. 589, s 1, eff. 3/20/2020.

Amended by 2019 Tenn. Acts, ch. 110, s 1, eff. 4/11/2019.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 845, s 1, eff. 4/26/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 523, Secs.s 2, s 3eff. 2/28/2018.

Amended by 2018 Tenn. Acts, ch. 496, s 1, eff. 2/22/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 293, s 2, eff. 3/1/2018.

Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 220, s 1, eff. 7/1/2017.

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 1007, s 1, eff. 4/27/2016.

Acts 1971, ch. 164, § 7; 1971, ch. 386, § 2; 1973, ch. 105, § 1; 1977, ch. 366, § 1; 1980, ch. 647, §§ 1, 2; 1981, ch. 131, § 43; T.C.A., § 70-330; Acts 1983, ch. 38, § 1; 1984, ch. 804, § 6; 1988, ch. 688, §§ 3, 7; 1989, ch. 114, § 1; 1993, ch. 155, § 1; 1998, ch. 659, § 4; 1998, ch. 735, § 2; 2004, ch. 519, §1; 2009 , ch. 271, §1; 2009 , ch. 289, §2; 2009 , ch. 330, §1; 2009 , ch. 464, §§ 2, 5.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013).
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013). · cites it 2× “Tenn.Code Ann. § 69-3-108(g). In no way do the Act or its accompanying regulations shield TDEC’s and the Commissioner’s interpretation of the Antide-gradation Rule from Board review under a direct permit appeal.”
Mays v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 699 F. Supp. 2d 991 (E.D. Tenn. 2010). · cites it 2× “§ 1311 (a); T.C.A. § 69-3-108(b)(l), (6). Plaintiffs also allege that TVA violated the federal Clean .”
Stephens v. Koch Foods, LLC, 667 F. Supp. 2d 768 (E.D. Tenn. 2009). · cites it 2× “[§ ] 1311(a) and Tenn.Code Ann. § 69-3-108 by discharging untreated sewage from the pump station located on Claude Collins Road in Hamblen County, onto neighboring properties and into a nearby creek.”
Brewer v. City of Bristol, 577 F. Supp. 519 (E.D. Tenn. 1983). · cites it 2× “The Commissioner further alleged violations of T.C.A. §§ 69-3-108(b)(l)(3) and (6); 69-3-114(a) and (b).”
Sierra Club v. Tenn. Dep't of Envir., 133 F.4th 661 (6th Cir. 2025). “” Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108 (q)(1)(A), (B).”
State v. Champion Int'l Corp., 709 S.W.2d 569 (Tenn. 1986). · cites it 4× “T.C.A. § 69-3-108. The agency is authorized to cooperate closely with the Administrator of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and "to enter into agreements with other states and the United States relative to prevention and control of pollution in interstate waters.”
Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “(b) In addition, it is unlawful for any person to act in a manner or degree which is violative of any provision of this part or of any permits or orders issued pursuant to the provisions of this part; or to fail or refuse to file an application for a permit as required in §…”
City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 6× “4 Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108 (b)(2), (c) (2003).”
State of Tennessee, ex rel. Paul G. Summers & Milton H. Hamilton, Jr. v. B&H Investments, Inc., Charles R. Smith & Alvin G. Pierce (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 6× “§69-3-114 (b) for failing to furnish a remedial plan, and Tenn. Code Ann. §69-3-108 for altering the body of water without a permit.”
James Davis d/b/a Davis Auto Repair v. Tennessee Bd. of Water Quality, Oil, & Gas (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “3 As noted by the Appellee, under Tennessee Code Annotated section 69-3-108(l), “[w]here the commissioner finds that a category of activities or discharges would be appropriately regulated under a general permit, the commissioner may issue such a permit.”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “[Appellees] contend[] that these rules and statutes, specifically §69-3-108(e) [now (g)] and §69- 3-102, require more than a mere guess or supposition in finding that the discharge will not cause or contribute to a condition of pollution, and in concluding that degradation will…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(a) — 1 case
Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “(b) In addition, it is unlawful for any person to act in a manner or degree which is violative of any provision of this part or of any permits or orders issued pursuant to the provisions of this part; or to fail or refuse to file an application for a permit as required in §…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(b)(l) — 1 case
Mays v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 699 F. Supp. 2d 991 (E.D. Tenn. 2010). “§ 1311 (a); T.C.A. § 69-3-108(b)(l), (6). Plaintiffs also allege that TVA violated the federal Clean .”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(b)(l)(3) — 1 case
Brewer v. City of Bristol, 577 F. Supp. 519 (E.D. Tenn. 1983). “The Commissioner further alleged violations of T.C.A. §§ 69-3-108(b)(l)(3) and (6); 69-3-114(a) and (b).”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(e) — 1 case
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “[Appellees] contend[] that these rules and statutes, specifically §69-3-108(e) [now (g)] and §69- 3-102, require more than a mere guess or supposition in finding that the discharge will not cause or contribute to a condition of pollution, and in concluding that degradation will…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(g) — 3 cases
E. Ron Pickard v. Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd., 424 S.W.3d 511 (Tenn. 2013). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 69-3-108(g). In no way do the Act or its accompanying regulations shield TDEC’s and the Commissioner’s interpretation of the Antide-gradation Rule from Board review under a direct permit appeal.”
E. Ron Pickard & Linda Pickard, as Trs. of the Sharon Charitable Trust & as Individuals v. Tennessee Dep't of Env't & Conservation, Tennessee Water Quality Control Bd. & Tennessee Materials Corp. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2012). “[Appellees] contend[] that these rules and statutes, specifically §69-3-108(e) [now (g)] and §69- 3-102, require more than a mere guess or supposition in finding that the discharge will not cause or contribute to a condition of pollution, and in concluding that degradation will…”
Starlink Logistics, Inc. v. ACC, LLC (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “(b) In addition, it is unlawful for any person to act in a manner or degree which is violative of any provision of this part or of any permits or orders issued pursuant to the provisions of this part; or to fail or refuse to file an application for a permit as required in §…”
— Tenn. Code Ann. § 69-3-108(l) — 1 case
James Davis d/b/a Davis Auto Repair v. Tennessee Bd. of Water Quality, Oil, & Gas (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “3 As noted by the Appellee, under Tennessee Code Annotated section 69-3-108(l), “[w]here the commissioner finds that a category of activities or discharges would be appropriately regulated under a general permit, the commissioner may issue such a permit.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.