Tennessee Code Annotated
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (2026)
Right of elderly person or disabled adult to recover for abuse or neglect, sexual abuse, exploitation, or theft
✓ current as of May 2026
- (a) As used in this section, unless the context otherwise requires:
- (1) "Capacity to consent" means the mental ability to make a rational decision, which includes the ability to perceive, appreciate all relevant facts and to reach a rational judgment upon such facts; or to make and carry out reasonable decisions concerning the person or the person's resources; or to protect the person from neglect, or hazardous or abusive situations without assistance;
- (2) "Disabled adult" means a person who is eighteen (18) years of age or older and who meets one (1) of the following:
- (A) Has some impairment of body or mind that makes the person unfit to work at any substantially remunerative employment;
- (B) Lacks the capacity to consent;
- (C) Has been certified as permanently and totally disabled by an agency of this state or the United States that has the function of so classifying persons; or
- (D) Has been found to be incompetent by a court of proper jurisdiction; and
- (3) "Elderly person" or "elder" means a person who is sixty (60) years of age or older who has some mental or physical dysfunctioning, including any resulting from age.
- (b) In addition to other remedies provided by law, an elderly person or disabled adult in that person's own right, or by conservator or next friend, has a right of recovery in a civil action for compensatory damages for abuse or neglect; sexual abuse or exploitation, as defined in this part; theft of such person's or adult's money or property whether by fraud, deceit, coercion, or otherwise; or abuse or neglect, sexual abuse, or financial exploitation, as those terms are defined in § 31-4-106, by a caretaker. Such right of action against a wrongdoer must not abate or be extinguished by the death of the elderly person or disabled adult, but must pass as provided in § 20-5-106, unless the alleged wrongdoer is a family member, in which case the cause of action must pass to the victim's personal representative; provided, that, if the personal representative is the alleged wrongdoer, then it must pass to any interested party that is not the alleged wrongdoer.
- (c) Jurisdiction for such action shall be in the circuit or chancery court where the elderly person or disabled adult may reside or where the actions occurred.
- (d) Damages include compensatory damages and costs where it is proven that a defendant is liable for abuse or neglect; sexual abuse or exploitation, as defined in this part; for theft of such elderly person's or disabled adult's money or property whether by fraud, deceit, coercion or otherwise; or for abuse or neglect, sexual abuse, or financial exploitation, as those terms are defined in § 31-4-106, by a caretaker. Costs include reasonable expenses and reasonable attorney's fees. As part of any judgment, the court may declare void and unenforceable any marriage proven to have been entered into as part of a scheme to commit abuse or neglect, sexual abuse or exploitation as defined in this part, or theft of such elderly person's or disabled adult's money or property whether by fraud, deceit, coercion, or otherwise.
- (e) In addition to the damages described in (d), a defendant may also be found liable for punitive damages in accordance with applicable common law standards.
- (f) Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the department of human services to initiate any proceedings pursuant to this section or to act on behalf of any elderly person or disabled adult subject to this section.
- (g) This section shall not apply to a cause of action within the scope of title 29, chapter 26; such cause of action shall be governed solely by title 29, chapter 26.
- (h) A financial institution, officer, director, or employee of a financial institution, shall not be liable in any civil action brought by or on behalf of a disabled adult or elderly person for recovery of damages under this chapter, unless prior to such civil action, the financial institution, officer, director, or employee of a financial institution, shall have been convicted of a violation of § 39-15-502; provided, however, that this provision shall not apply to theft or conversion by an employee, officer or director of a financial institution or liability arising under other law.
- (i) In any will or estate contest provided under title 30, 31, or 32 or in any proceeding contesting the validity of any gifts, bequests, or other transactions, a caretaker found liable under subsection (b) is in a per se confidential relationship with the elderly person or disabled adult so as to raise the presumption of undue influence requiring the caretaker to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the challenged bequest was fair.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 772,s 5, eff. 4/23/2024.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 772,s 4, eff. 4/23/2024.
Amended by 2024 Tenn. Acts, ch. 772,s 3, eff. 4/23/2024.
Amended by 2017 Tenn. Acts, ch. 466, s 6, eff. 7/1/2017.
Acts 1999, ch. 247, § 1; 2000, ch. 768, §§ 1 - 3; 2004, ch. 780, § 5.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007).
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Est. of Martha S. French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011). “” 19 Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Abuse or neglect” is defined in the statute as: [T]he infliction of physical pain, injury, or mental anguish, or the deprivation of services by a caretaker that are necessary to maintain the health and welfare of an adult or a situation in…”
Cannon v. McKendree Vill., Inc., 295 S.W.3d 278 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 71-6-120(g). Under the express terms of the TAPA, therefore, the trial court’s holding was correct that because Mr.”
In Re Conservatorship of Mary Annie Haynes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Next, again in the section of Appellant’s brief dealing with attorney’s fees,5 Appellant asserts that he “has standing as next friend to recover in a civil action” under the Tennessee Adult Protection Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-6-120. Neither of these bare…”
Daniel H. Rader IV ex rel. Est. of Christine Joy Koczwara v. John Beasley (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Such right of action against a wrongdoer must not abate or be extinguished by the death of the elderly person or disabled adult but must pass as provided in § 20-5-106.”
Betty Jane Davis v. Leesa Renna Davis (Tenn. Ct. App. 2026). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b) (emphases added).”
Mathes v. Burns (M.D. Tenn. 2019). “¶ 19), and that Burns and RMF exploited the Decedent, an elderly person, causing the conversion of funds belonging to him by fraud and coercion, in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (id. ¶ 20). The Petition seeks relief in the form of (1) a Temporary Restraining Order…”
Tina Y. Vaughn v. Kimberly Dickens-Durham (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (c) (“Jurisdiction for such action [i.”
Robert William Arndts, by Conservator, Carol Zeliff, Darrell R. Smith v. Violet A Bonner & Tommy L. Raines (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004). “Plaintiff further alleged that defendants acted in concert with Gladys in violation of Tenn. Code Ann. §71-6-120 , and sought compensatory damages and attorneys fees.”
In Re Est. of Alys Harris Lipscomb (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “The Estate also added a claim of exploitation of an elderly and/or disabled person under Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-6-120. On October 1, 2015, the Estate filed a petition to hold Appellant in contempt after she listed various items that allegedly belonged to Decedent…”
In Re: Sallie Ann Hofmann (Tenn. Ct. App. 2020). “E2019-01856-COA-R3-CV This appeal concerns an action to establish undue influence and violations of the Tennessee Adult Protection Act, codified at Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-6-120, et seq.2 The trial court denied the claims submitted by Plaintiff.”
In Re Est. of John Jefferson Waller (Tenn. Ct. App. 2022). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (2019). And Ms.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(1): 1 case
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(2): 1 case
Daniel H. Rader IV ex rel. Est. of Christine Joy Koczwara v. John Beasley (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Such right of action against a wrongdoer must not abate or be extinguished by the death of the elderly person or disabled adult but must pass as provided in § 20-5-106.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(3): 1 case
Daniel H. Rader IV ex rel. Est. of Christine Joy Koczwara v. John Beasley (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Such right of action against a wrongdoer must not abate or be extinguished by the death of the elderly person or disabled adult but must pass as provided in § 20-5-106.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(a): 1 case
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(a)(2): 1 case
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(a)(3): 1 case
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(b): 5 cases
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Est. of Martha S. French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011). “” 19 Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Abuse or neglect” is defined in the statute as: [T]he infliction of physical pain, injury, or mental anguish, or the deprivation of services by a caretaker that are necessary to maintain the health and welfare of an adult or a situation in…”
In Re Conservatorship of Mary Annie Haynes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Next, again in the section of Appellant’s brief dealing with attorney’s fees,5 Appellant asserts that he “has standing as next friend to recover in a civil action” under the Tennessee Adult Protection Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-6-120. Neither of these bare…”
Tina Y. Vaughn v. Kimberly Dickens-Durham (Tenn. Ct. App. 2018). “Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (c) (“Jurisdiction for such action [i.”
Daniel H. Rader IV ex rel. Est. of Christine Joy Koczwara v. John Beasley (Tenn. Ct. App. 2025). “See Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Such right of action against a wrongdoer must not abate or be extinguished by the death of the elderly person or disabled adult but must pass as provided in § 20-5-106.”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(d): 3 cases
Est. of Martha S. French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011). “” 19 Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Abuse or neglect” is defined in the statute as: [T]he infliction of physical pain, injury, or mental anguish, or the deprivation of services by a caretaker that are necessary to maintain the health and welfare of an adult or a situation in…”
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
In Re Conservatorship of Mary Annie Haynes (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Next, again in the section of Appellant’s brief dealing with attorney’s fees,5 Appellant asserts that he “has standing as next friend to recover in a civil action” under the Tennessee Adult Protection Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 71-6-120. Neither of these bare…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120(g): 3 cases
Est. of Martha S. French v. Stratford House, 333 S.W.3d 546 (Tenn. 2011). “” 19 Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (b). “Abuse or neglect” is defined in the statute as: [T]he infliction of physical pain, injury, or mental anguish, or the deprivation of services by a caretaker that are necessary to maintain the health and welfare of an adult or a situation in…”
Conley v. Life Care Centers of Am., Inc., 236 S.W.3d 713 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007). “The trial court denied the Motion to Amend, citing Tenn. Code Ann. § 71-6-120 (g) and stating, "this is a cause of action within the scope of Title 29, Chapter 26 and, therefore, this action shall be governed only by Title 29, Chapter 26, and the Tennessee Adult Protection Act…”
Cannon v. McKendree Vill., Inc., 295 S.W.3d 278 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008). “Tenn.Code Ann. § 71-6-120(g). Under the express terms of the TAPA, therefore, the trial court’s holding was correct that because Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.