Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-36-201 (2026)

Eligibility for retirement - Dispensation of benefits

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Amended by 2016 Tenn. Acts, ch. 605, s 7, eff. 3/17/2016.

Acts 1972, ch. 814, § 5; 1973, ch. 347, § 17; 1975, ch. 315, § 5; 1976, ch. 604, § 1; T.C.A., §§ 8-3905(a), 8-3914(b); Acts 1982, ch. 885, § 1; 1983, ch. 308, § 1; 1983, ch. 342, § 6; 1984, ch. 601, § 2; 1985, ch. 353, § 1; 1986, ch. 554, § 12; 1986, ch. 568, § 3; 1989, ch. 509, § 1; 1993, ch. 508, § 4; 1994, ch. 863, § 1; 1997 , ch. 67, § 1; 1998, ch. 1011, § 3; 1998, ch. 1072, § 1; 1999, ch. 273, § 1; 2007 , ch. 488, § 1; 2010 , ch. 777, § 28.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Durham v. Martin, 388 F. Supp. 3d 919 (M.D. Tenn. 2019).
Durham v. Martin, 388 F. Supp. 3d 919 (M.D. Tenn. 2019). · cites it 9× “In other words, the defendants' position is that the plaintiff did not have a vested property interest in retirement benefits and would not have had such a property interest, even if he had continued to serve in the General Assembly until his term expired at the end of 2016,…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-36-201(a)(1): 1 case
Durham v. Martin, 388 F. Supp. 3d 919 (M.D. Tenn. 2019). “In other words, the defendants' position is that the plaintiff did not have a vested property interest in retirement benefits and would not have had such a property interest, even if he had continued to serve in the General Assembly until his term expired at the end of 2016,…”
Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-36-201(i): 1 case
Durham v. Martin, 388 F. Supp. 3d 919 (M.D. Tenn. 2019). “In other words, the defendants' position is that the plaintiff did not have a vested property interest in retirement benefits and would not have had such a property interest, even if he had continued to serve in the General Assembly until his term expired at the end of 2016,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.