Tennessee Code Annotated

Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-207 (2026)

Disobedience of process

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaTenn. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A sheriff's disobedience of the command of any process is a contempt of the court from which it issued, and may be punished accordingly; and such sheriff is further liable to the action of the party aggrieved.

Code 1858, § 361 (deriv. Acts 1777 (Nov.), ch. 8, § 5); Shan., § 451; Code 1932, § 698; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 8-816.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2017 · leading case: Hurd v. Woolfork, 959 S.W.2d 578 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997).
Hurd v. Woolfork, 959 S.W.2d 578 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 10× “T.C.A. § 8-8-207 (1993) (emphasis added).”
Jason Ray v. Madison Cnty., Tennessee (Tenn. 2017). · cites it 2× “Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-207 (2016). From these statutes, and our discussion in Shorts, it is clear that Tennessee sheriffs are bound by judgments and orders and have no obligation or authority to challenge a sentence imposed by a court.”
Lineberry v. Locke (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “The sheriff’s duty is to execute the warrant, Tenn. Code Ann. § 8-8-201 (5)(A), and the failure to do so is a contempt of court, Tenn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.