Meredith v. Sharp, 259 S.W.2d 172 (Tex. 1953). · Go Syfert
Search
Meredith v. Sharp, 259 S.W.2d 172 (Tex. 1953). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Avery v. Midland County (tex, 1966-07-13) · Strongest negative: Concerned Citizens for Equality v. McDonald (txed, 1994-09-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Concerned Citizens for Equality v. McDonald (2×)
E.D. Tex. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Meredith v. Sharp, 256 S.W.2d 870 (Tex. Civ.App-Texarkana, writ raft n.r.e.), 152 Tex. 437 , 259 S.W.2d 172 (1953) (per curiam).
examined Cited "see" Avery v. Midland County (4×)
Tex. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Meredith v. Sharp, Tex.Civ.App., 256 S.W.2d 870 (1953, writ refused, no reversible error) with Per Curiam opinion, 152 Tex. 437 , 259 S.W.2d 172 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perry Meredith
v.
Earl Sharp Et Al.
A-4177.
Texas Supreme Court.
Jun 24, 1953.
259 S.W.2d 172
1953 Tex. LEXIS 464
Smead & Barbour and H. P. Smead, of Longview, for petitioner., Demid Moore, Criminal District Attorney of Gregg County, and Paul J. McClung, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 14 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam;

Under our view petitioner has no interest, financially or otherwise, which would authorize him to maintain this suit. Yett v. Cook, 115 Tex. 205, 281 S. W. 837. The trial court should therefore have dismissed the suit rather than deny the writ, but since the practical effect of the two orders is the same, no purpose would be served in granting the writ to reform the judgment. The application is therefore stamped Refused. No Reversible Error.

Opinion delivered June 24, 1953.