MEMORANDUM OPINION

After appellant Patrick Cogan pleaded guilty to possessing less than one gram of cocaine, he was adjudged guilty and placed on community supervision. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a), (b) (West 2003). The State later moved to revoke Cogan’s supervision, and he pleaded true to some of the alleged violations. The court revoked supervision and imposed a two-year state jail sentence.

Cogan’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to Cogan, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith Affirmed Filed: October 28, 2004 Do Not Publish