Texas Codes

Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 153.402 (2026)

Standing To Bring Proceeding

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 153.402. STANDING TO BRING PROCEEDING. (a) Subject to Subsection (b), a limited partner may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless:

(1) the limited partner:

(A) was a limited partner of the limited partnership at the time of the act or omission complained of; or

(B) became a limited partner by operation of law originating from a person that was a limited partner or general partner at the time of the act or omission complained of; and

(2) the limited partner fairly and adequately represents the interests of the limited partnership in enforcing the right of the limited partnership.

(b) If the converted entity in a conversion is a limited partnership, a limited partner of that limited partnership may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding based on an act or omission that occurred with respect to the converting entity before the date of the conversion unless:

(1) the limited partner was an equity owner of the converting entity at the time of the act or omission; and

(2) the limited partner fairly and adequately represents the interests of the limited partnership in enforcing the right of the limited partnership.

Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 182, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2006.

Amended by:

Acts 2019, 86th Leg., R.S., Ch. 899 (H.B. 3603), Sec. 26, eff. September 1, 2019.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2012–2023 · leading case: Wesolek ex rel. Layton Energy Wharton Fund, LP v. Layton, 871 F. Supp. 2d 620 (S.D. Tex. 2012).
Wesolek ex rel. Layton Energy Wharton Fund, LP v. Layton, 871 F. Supp. 2d 620 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “Tex. Bus. Org. Code § 153.401. In such a situation “the plaintiff must be a limited partner when the action is brought,” Tex.”
Wesolek v. Layton, 914 F. Supp. 2d 853 (S.D. Tex. 2012). “Tex. Bus. Org. Code § 153.401. In such a situation "the plaintiff must be a limited partner when the action is brought,” Tex.”
Kenneth L. Berry, Individually Kenneth L. Berry, as Tr. of the Berry Dynasty Trust Kenneth L. Berry, Tr. in a Derivative Capacity for Flying Bull Ranch, Ltd. & Chelsea Nichole Briers v. Dennis W. Berry Marvin G. Berry Allen L. Berry FB Ranch, LLC Berry GP, Inc. D/B/A Berry Contracting, Inc., Berry Contracting, LP D/B/A Bay, Ltd., & Berry Ranches, LLC. (Tex. App. 2020). “402 provides in part: (a) Subject to Subsection (b), a limited partner may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless: (1) the limited partner: (A) was a limited partner of the limited partnership at the time of the act or omission complained of; or .”
Bierschenk v. Chesher (N.D. Tex. 2023). “”? TEx. Bus. ORGS. CODE § 153.402(a). It is undisputed that Plaintiff is not a limited partner and was not when this suit was commenced.”
— Tex. Bus. Orgs. Code § 153.402(a) — 2 cases
Kenneth L. Berry, Individually Kenneth L. Berry, as Tr. of the Berry Dynasty Trust Kenneth L. Berry, Tr. in a Derivative Capacity for Flying Bull Ranch, Ltd. & Chelsea Nichole Briers v. Dennis W. Berry Marvin G. Berry Allen L. Berry FB Ranch, LLC Berry GP, Inc. D/B/A Berry Contracting, Inc., Berry Contracting, LP D/B/A Bay, Ltd., & Berry Ranches, LLC. (Tex. App. 2020). “402 provides in part: (a) Subject to Subsection (b), a limited partner may not institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless: (1) the limited partner: (A) was a limited partner of the limited partnership at the time of the act or omission complained of; or .”
Bierschenk v. Chesher (N.D. Tex. 2023). “”? TEx. Bus. ORGS. CODE § 153.402(a). It is undisputed that Plaintiff is not a limited partner and was not when this suit was commenced.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.