Texas Codes

Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 7.057. APPEALS. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (e), a person may appeal in writing to the commissioner if the person is aggrieved by:

(1) the school laws of this state; or

(2) actions or decisions of any school district board of trustees that violate:

(A) the school laws of this state; or

(B) a provision of a written employment contract between the school district and a school district employee, if a violation causes or would cause monetary harm to the employee.

(a-1) A person is not required to appeal to the commissioner before pursuing a remedy under a law outside of Title 1 or this title to which Title 1 or this title makes reference or with which Title 1 or this title requires compliance.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), the commissioner after due notice to the parties interested shall, not later than the 180th day after the date an appeal under Subsection (a) is filed, hold a hearing and issue a decision without cost to the parties involved. In conducting a hearing under this subsection, the commissioner has the same authority relating to discovery and conduct of a hearing as a hearing examiner has under Subchapter F, Chapter 21. This section does not deprive any party of any legal remedy.

(c) In an appeal against a school district, the commissioner shall, not later than the 240th day after the date the appeal is filed, issue a decision based on a review of the record developed at the district level under a substantial evidence standard of review. The parties to the appeal may agree in writing to extend, by not more than 60 days, the date by which the commissioner must issue a decision under this subsection. A school district's disclosure of the record to the commissioner under this subsection is not an offense under Section 551.146, Government Code.

(d) A person aggrieved by an action of the agency or decision of the commissioner under this section may appeal to a district court in Travis County. An appeal must be made by serving the commissioner with citation issued and served in the manner provided by law for civil suits. The petition must state the action or decision from which the appeal is taken. At trial, the court shall determine all issues of law and fact, except as provided by Section 33.081(g).

(e) This section does not apply to:

(1) a case to which Subchapter G, Chapter 21, applies; or

(2) a student disciplinary action under Chapter 37.

(f) In this section:

(1) "Record" includes, at a minimum, an audible electronic recording or written transcript of all oral testimony or argument.

(2) "School laws of this state" means Title 1 and this title and rules adopted under those titles.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 260, Sec. 1, eff. May 30, 1995. Amended by Acts 2001, 77th Leg., ch. 895, Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2001.

Amended by:

Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 1111 (H.B. 829), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2009.

Acts 2013, 83rd Leg., R.S., Ch. 371 (H.B. 2952), Sec. 1, eff. June 14, 2013.

Acts 2025, 89th Leg., 2nd C.S., Ch. 6 (H.B. 8), Sec. 3.001, eff. December 4, 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 177 cases (33 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016).
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). · cites it 8× “” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l).. Relying on section 7.”
Smith v. Nelson, 53 S.W.3d 792 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001). · cites it 15× “See Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057 (West 1996). Prior to 1995, Smith would have been entitled to appeal any grievance to the Commissioner.”
Michael McIntyre & Laura McIntyre, Individually & on Behalf of Their Child., K.M., L.M., C.M., M.M., & L.M. v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., Dr. Lorenzo Garcia, & Mark Mendoza, 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). · cites it 12× “Laws 3054 (codified at Tex Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l)). The parties do not address this provision.”
Texas Comm'r of Educ. & Mission Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Dr. Maria Solis, 562 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). · cites it 14× “Petitioner’s Texas Education Code section 7.057 claims should be dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
Austin Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Lowery, 212 S.W.3d 827 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006). · cites it 6× “Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057(a) (West 2006).”
Jenkins v. Crosby Indep. Sch. Dist., 537 S.W.3d 142 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017). · cites it 4× “Agency, Hearings Brought Under Texas Education. Code, § 7.057). . See Tex.”
Waco Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Gibson, 22 S.W.3d 849 (Tex. 2000). · cites it 2× “WISD has not challenged that part of the judgment, and it is not before us.”
Ollie, Dorothy v. Plano Indep. Sch. Dist., 383 S.W.3d 783 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012). · cites it 3× “Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 7.057 (a)(2)(B) (West Supp.”
Jones v. Clarksville Indep. Sch. Dist., 46 S.W.3d 467 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2001). · cites it 2× “Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057 (Vernon 1996) provides: (a) Except as provided by Subsection (e), [1] a person may appeal in writing to the commissioner if the person is aggrieved by: (1) the school laws of this state; or (2) actions or decisions of any school district board of…”
Gibson v. Waco Indep. Sch. Dist., 971 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. App.—Waco 1998). · cites it 3× “Laws 6 , 10 (repealed 1995) (current version at Tex. EduC.Code Ann. § 7.057(a) (Vernon 1996)).”
Gutierrez v. Laredo Indep. Sch. Dist., 139 S.W.3d 363 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2004). · cites it 2× “); see also Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 7.057 (Vernon 1996 & Supp.”
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a): 39 cases
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). “” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l).. Relying on section 7.”
Austin Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Lowery, 212 S.W.3d 827 (Tex. App.—Austin 2006). “Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057(a) (West 2006).”
Michael McIntyre & Laura McIntyre, Individually & on Behalf of Their Child., K.M., L.M., C.M., M.M., & L.M. v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., Dr. Lorenzo Garcia, & Mark Mendoza, 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). “Laws 3054 (codified at Tex Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l)). The parties do not address this provision.”
Smith v. Nelson, 53 S.W.3d 792 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001). “See Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057 (West 1996). Prior to 1995, Smith would have been entitled to appeal any grievance to the Commissioner.”
Jenkins v. Crosby Indep. Sch. Dist., 537 S.W.3d 142 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017). “Agency, Hearings Brought Under Texas Education. Code, § 7.057). . See Tex.”
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a)(1): 6 cases
Michael McIntyre & Laura McIntyre, Individually & on Behalf of Their Child., K.M., L.M., C.M., M.M., & L.M. v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., Dr. Lorenzo Garcia, & Mark Mendoza, 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). “Laws 3054 (codified at Tex Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l)). The parties do not address this provision.”
Friona Indep. Sch. Dist. v. King, 15 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000).
Van Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Scott A. McCarty, 162 S.W.3d 254 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2003).
Webb Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Robert Marshall & Amy Marshall, No. 04-22-00178-CV (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 13, 2023).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a)(2): 5 cases
Texas Comm'r of Educ. & Mission Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Dr. Maria Solis, 562 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). “Petitioner’s Texas Education Code section 7.057 claims should be dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
Gibson v. Waco Indep. Sch. Dist., 971 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. App.—Waco 1998). “Laws 6 , 10 (repealed 1995) (current version at Tex. EduC.Code Ann. § 7.057(a) (Vernon 1996)).”
Elijah Granger, Ed.D v. Mike Morath, in His Capacity as Comm'r of Educ., & Lancaster Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 14-23-00245-CV (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] May 30, 2024).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a)(2)(A): 15 cases
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). “” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l).. Relying on section 7.”
Texas Comm'r of Educ. & Mission Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Dr. Maria Solis, 562 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). “Petitioner’s Texas Education Code section 7.057 claims should be dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
Gibson v. Waco Indep. Sch. Dist., 971 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. App.—Waco 1998). “Laws 6 , 10 (repealed 1995) (current version at Tex. EduC.Code Ann. § 7.057(a) (Vernon 1996)).”
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a)(2)(B): 15 cases
Smith v. Nelson, 53 S.W.3d 792 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001). “See Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057 (West 1996). Prior to 1995, Smith would have been entitled to appeal any grievance to the Commissioner.”
Godley Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Woods, 21 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. App.—Waco 2000).
Azleway Charter Sch. v. Hogue, 515 S.W.3d 359 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2016).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a)(2)(a): 1 case
Jenkins v. Crosby Indep. Sch. Dist., 537 S.W.3d 142 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017). “Agency, Hearings Brought Under Texas Education. Code, § 7.057). . See Tex.”
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(b): 5 cases
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). “” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l).. Relying on section 7.”
Michael McIntyre & Laura McIntyre, Individually & on Behalf of Their Child., K.M., L.M., C.M., M.M., & L.M. v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., Dr. Lorenzo Garcia, & Mark Mendoza, 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). “Laws 3054 (codified at Tex Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l)). The parties do not address this provision.”
Mike Morath in His Off. Capacity as the Comm'r of Educ. v. Kingsville Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 15-24-00007-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Apr. 3, 2025).
Mike Morath in His Off. Capacity as the Comm'r of Educ. v. Kingsville Indep. Sch. Dist., No. 15-24-00007-CV (Tex. App.—15th Dist. Apr. 3, 2025).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(c): 8 cases
Texas Comm'r of Educ. & Mission Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Dr. Maria Solis, 562 S.W.3d 591 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). “Petitioner’s Texas Education Code section 7.057 claims should be dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”
Amaral-Whittenberg v. Alanis, 123 S.W.3d 714 (Tex. App.—Austin 2003).
Marble Falls Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Scott, 275 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008).
Marble Falls Indepen. Sch. Dist. v. Scott, 275 S.W.3d 558 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(d): 30 cases
Smith v. Nelson, 53 S.W.3d 792 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001). “See Tex. Educ.Code Ann. § 7.057 (West 1996). Prior to 1995, Smith would have been entitled to appeal any grievance to the Commissioner.”
Jenkins v. Crosby Indep. Sch. Dist., 537 S.W.3d 142 (Tex. App.—Austin 2017). “Agency, Hearings Brought Under Texas Education. Code, § 7.057). . See Tex.”
Poole v. Karnack Indep. Sch. Dist., 344 S.W.3d 440 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011).
Robert Scott, Comm'r of Educ. v. Alphonso Crutch Life Support Ctr., 392 S.W.3d 132 (Tex. App.—Austin 2009).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(e)(1): 1 case
O'Neal v. Ector Cnty. Indep. Sch. Dist., 251 S.W.3d 50 (Tex. 2008).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(e)(2): 1 case
Bastrop Indep. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Trs. v. Toungate, 922 S.W.2d 650 (Tex. App.—Austin 1996).
Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(f)(2): 11 cases
Clint Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, & Alicia Gomez, for & on the Behalf of Their Minor Child., 487 S.W.3d 538 (Tex. 2016). “” Tex. Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l).. Relying on section 7.”
Michael McIntyre & Laura McIntyre, Individually & on Behalf of Their Child., K.M., L.M., C.M., M.M., & L.M. v. El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist., Dr. Lorenzo Garcia, & Mark Mendoza, 499 S.W.3d 820 (Tex. 2016). “Laws 3054 (codified at Tex Educ. Code § 7.057(a-l)). The parties do not address this provision.”
Larsen v. Santa Fe Indep. Sch. Dist., 296 S.W.3d 118 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009).
Friona Indep. Sch. Dist. v. King, 15 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2000).
El Paso Indep. Sch. Dist. v. McIntyre, 457 S.W.3d 475 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2014).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.