Texas Codes

Tex. Elec. Code § 232.016 (2026)

Appeal Suspends Execution Of Judgment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 232.016. APPEAL SUSPENDS EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT. The perfecting of an appeal in an election contest suspends the execution of the district court's judgment pending the disposition of the appeal without the necessity for a supersedeas bond.

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986.

SUBCHAPTER B. COURT-ORDERED ELECTION FOLLOWING JUDGMENT OF VOID ELECTION


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007).
Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 232.016. Zane urges this Court to review the trial court's determination of the eligibility of six voters, three who presumably voted for Zane, and three the parties believe voted for Jones.”
Esequiel De La Paz v. Ofelia Gutierrez (Tex. App. 2019). · cites it 3× “See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.016 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.”
Raul (Roy) Morales v. Rudy Segura (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “25 Tex. Elec. Code Ann. § 232.016 (West 2014) .”
Armando O'Caña v. Norberto 'Beto' Salinas (Tex. App. 2019). “See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.016 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.”
Daisy Campos Rodriguez v. Ricardo \Richie\" Rangel (2023). “See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 221.015(b). But as he notes, Daisy’s appeal has “suspend[ed] the execution of the trial court’s judgment pending the disposition of the appeal.”
Sonia Trevino v. Ramon Segovia (Tex. App. 2024). “…no longer pending. As a result, the trial court’s judgment declaring Segovia the winner is no longer suspended. See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.016. 8”
Zane Kiehne v. Thomas F. Jones (Tex. App. 2007). “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 232.016. Zane urges this Court to review the trial court's determination of the eligibility of six voters, three who presumably voted for Zane, and three the parties believe voted for Jones.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.