Sec. 232.016. APPEAL SUSPENDS EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT. The perfecting of an appeal in an election contest suspends the execution of the district court's judgment pending the disposition of the appeal without the necessity for a supersedeas bond.
Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986.
SUBCHAPTER B. COURT-ORDERED ELECTION FOLLOWING JUDGMENT OF VOID ELECTION
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
7
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case:
Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007).
Kiehne v. Jones, 247 S.W.3d 259 (Tex. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 232.016. Zane urges this Court to review the trial court's determination of the eligibility of six voters, three who presumably voted for Zane, and three the parties believe voted for Jones.”
Sonia Trevino v. Ramon Segovia (Tex. App. 2024).
“…no longer pending. As a result, the trial court’s judgment declaring Segovia the winner is no longer suspended. See TEX. ELEC. CODE ANN. § 232.016. 8”
Zane Kiehne v. Thomas F. Jones (Tex. App. 2007).
“Tex.Elec.Code Ann. § 232.016. Zane urges this Court to review the trial court's determination of the eligibility of six voters, three who presumably voted for Zane, and three the parties believe voted for Jones.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.