Texas Codes

Tex. Fam. Code § 162.016 (2026)

Adoption Order

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 162.016. ADOPTION ORDER. (a) If a petition requesting termination has been joined with a petition requesting adoption, the court shall also terminate the parent-child relationship at the same time the adoption order is rendered. The court must make separate findings that the termination is in the best interest of the child and that the adoption is in the best interest of the child.

(b) If the court finds that the requirements for adoption have been met and the adoption is in the best interest of the child, the court shall grant the adoption.

(c) The name of the child may be changed in the order if requested.

Added by Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 20, Sec. 1, eff. April 20, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2022 · leading case: Goodson v. Castellanos, 214 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. App. 2007).
Goodson v. Castellanos, 214 S.W.3d 741 (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016 (West 2002).”
Celestine v. Dep't of Fam. & Prot. Servs., 321 S.W.3d 222 (Tex. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “See Tex. FaM. Code Ann. § 162.016 (b) (Vernon 2008).”
In the Interest of H.B.C., 482 S.W.3d 696 (Tex. App. 2016). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016 (West 2014).”
in the Interest of J.G., D.G., & C.G., Child., 412 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “016(b) states that “[i]f the court finds that the requirements for adoption have been met and the adoption is in the best interest of the child, the court shall grant the adoption.”
In the Interest of D.R.L.M., 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016(a), (b) (Vernon 1996) (both requiring an adoption-is-in-the-ehild’s-best-interest determination).”
in the Interest of C.R.P., a Child, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). “Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016 (Vernon 2002).”
Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras (Tex. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “” Conclusion of law number 1 states: “Under Texas Family Code Section 162.016, the Court finds that the requirements for adoption by Petitioner Gabriela Castro have not been [sic] and that adoption of the Child by Petitioner Gabriela Castro is not in the best interest of the…”
In Re Crp, 192 S.W.3d 823 (Tex. App. 2006). “TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 162.016 (Vernon 2002).”
In Re Drlm, 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016(a), (b) (Vernon 1996) (both requiring an adoption-is-in-the-child's-best-interest determination).”
Elizabeth Goodson v. Adelina Castellanos (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 162.016 (West 2002).”
Ediberto Gaona v. State (Tex. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 162.016 (West 2002).”
in the Interest of M.J.P. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 162.016(b) (West 2014).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 162.016(a) — 2 cases
In the Interest of D.R.L.M., 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016(a), (b) (Vernon 1996) (both requiring an adoption-is-in-the-ehild’s-best-interest determination).”
In Re Drlm, 84 S.W.3d 281 (Tex. App. 2002). “See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 162.016(a), (b) (Vernon 1996) (both requiring an adoption-is-in-the-child's-best-interest determination).”
— Tex. Fam. Code § 162.016(b) — 5 cases
Celestine v. Dep't of Fam. & Prot. Servs., 321 S.W.3d 222 (Tex. App. 2010). “See Tex. FaM. Code Ann. § 162.016 (b) (Vernon 2008).”
in the Interest of J.G., D.G., & C.G., Child., 412 S.W.3d 83 (Tex. App. 2013). “016(b) states that “[i]f the court finds that the requirements for adoption have been met and the adoption is in the best interest of the child, the court shall grant the adoption.”
in the Interest of M.J.P. (Tex. App. 2016). “” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 162.016(b) (West 2014).”
Gabriela Castro v. Jessie Contreras (Tex. App. 2022). “” Conclusion of law number 1 states: “Under Texas Family Code Section 162.016, the Court finds that the requirements for adoption by Petitioner Gabriela Castro have not been [sic] and that adoption of the Child by Petitioner Gabriela Castro is not in the best interest of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.