Texas Codes

Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 152.0772 (2026)

El Paso County Institutions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 152.0772. EL PASO COUNTY INSTITUTIONS. (a) The juvenile board of El Paso County shall appoint a person to supervise the county facilities under the jurisdiction of the juvenile board. The supervisor may be the county probation officer. The supervisor shall direct the policies and conduct of each institution.

(b) The juvenile board shall also appoint the head of each facility. The facility head may hire employees that the juvenile board determines are necessary.

(c) The facilities supervisor or employees under the supervisor's control shall supervise each child committed to a county institution until the child becomes of age. The supervisor or employees shall submit periodic reports to the juvenile board as required for the board's approval or action.

(d) The commissioners court shall provide the necessary funds to operate each institution.

Added by Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 352, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1989.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2011–2011 · leading case: El Paso Cnty. v. Solorzano, 351 S.W.3d 577 (Tex. App. 2011).
El Paso Cnty. v. Solorzano, 351 S.W.3d 577 (Tex. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “4 Tex.Hum.Res.Code Ann. § 152.0772(a). The Board appoints the head of each facility, and the facility head may hire employees that the Board determines are necessary.”
Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 152.0772(a): 1 case
El Paso Cnty. v. Solorzano, 351 S.W.3d 577 (Tex. App. 2011). “4 Tex.Hum.Res.Code Ann. § 152.0772(a). The Board appoints the head of each facility, and the facility head may hire employees that the Board determines are necessary.”
Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 152.0772(b): 1 case
El Paso Cnty. v. Solorzano, 351 S.W.3d 577 (Tex. App. 2011). “4 Tex.Hum.Res.Code Ann. § 152.0772(a). The Board appoints the head of each facility, and the facility head may hire employees that the Board determines are necessary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.