Sec. 212.201. COMMENCEMENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW; DEFENDANTS. (a) A party aggrieved by a final decision of the commission may obtain judicial review of the decision by bringing an action in a county court at law or district court for review of the decision against the commission on or after the date on which the decision is final, and not later than the 14th day after that date.
(b) Each other party to the proceeding before the commission must be made a defendant in an action under this subchapter.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Amended by:
Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 420 (H.B. 2760), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2025.
Notes of Decisions
Heart Hosp. IV, L.P. v. King, 116 S.W.3d 831 (Tex. App. 2003).
· cites it 4× “Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 212.201. If the equitable theory were to apply, it would apply so as to allow a plaintiff to refile his action within fourteen days after the date of dismissal.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Ins. v. Ashy, 972 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “201 uniformly hold that the requirement that each party to the proceeding before the Commission be made a defendant within fourteen days after the decision is final is both mandatory and jurisdictional.”
Johnson v. Oxy USA, Inc., 533 S.W.3d 395 (Tex. App. 2016).
“See Tex. Lab.Code § 212.201 (Vernon 2006). The examiner determined on February 21 that the city filed its protest one day late and therefore waived its rights to appeal the decision on the protest.”
Lorenz v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 211 F. App'x 242 (5th Cir. 2006).
“Although not making any ruling as to the propriety of Lorenz’s appeal, the court does note that judicial review of TWC decisions is permissible pursuant to Texas Labor Code § 212.201. Further, the TWC has treated Lorenz’s lawsuit as an appeal of its unemployment benefits…”
Benavidez v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Connecticut, 960 S.W.2d 422 (Tex. App. 1998).
“201 uniformly hold that the requirement that each party to the proceeding before the Commission be made a defendant within fourteen days after the decision is final is both mandatory and jurisdictional.”
Elfer v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 169 F. App'x 378 (5th Cir. 2006).
“4. . Tex. Lab.Code § 207.044(a) ("An individual is disqualified for benefits if the individual was discharged for misconduct connected with the individual’s last work.”
Tex. Lab. Code § 212.201(a): 11 cases
Heart Hosp. IV, L.P. v. King, 116 S.W.3d 831 (Tex. App. 2003).
“Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 212.201. If the equitable theory were to apply, it would apply so as to allow a plaintiff to refile his action within fourteen days after the date of dismissal.”
Tex. Lab. Code § 212.201(b): 3 cases
Elfer v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 169 F. App'x 378 (5th Cir. 2006).
“4. . Tex. Lab.Code § 207.044(a) ("An individual is disqualified for benefits if the individual was discharged for misconduct connected with the individual’s last work.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.