Sec. 410.169. EFFECT OF DECISION. A decision of an administrative law judge regarding benefits is final in the absence of a timely appeal by a party and is binding during the pendency of an appeal to the appeals panel.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Amended by:
Acts 2017, 85th Leg., R.S., Ch. 839 (H.B. 2111), Sec. 12, eff. September 1, 2017.
SUBCHAPTER E. APPEALS PANEL
Notes of Decisions
Cervantes v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 130 S.W.3d 152 (Tex. App. 2004).
· cites it 4× “Tyson filed a plea to the jurisdiction on May 6, 2002 arguing that under Texas Labor Code Section 410.169, the benefit contested case hearing decision became final and binding when it was not timely appealed.”
Rodriguez v. Serv. Lloyds Ins. Co., 997 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. 1999).
· cites it 2× “See TEX. LAB.CODE § 410.169. We held that Manasco did not exhaust his administrative remedies.”
Texas Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sonic Sys. Int'l, Inc., 214 S.W.3d 469 (Tex. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “See TEX. LAB.CODE ANN. § 410.169 ("A decision of a hearing officer regarding benefits is final in the absence of a timely appeal by a party.”
Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Manasco, 971 S.W.2d 60 (Tex. 1998).
· cites it 3× “Tex. Lab.Code § 410.169. A party has fifteen days after the decision is received *63 from the hearing officer in which to appeal.”
Krueger v. Atascosa Cnty., 155 S.W.3d 614 (Tex. App. 2004).
“See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.169 (Vernon 1996) ("[a] decision of a hearing officer regarding benefits is final in the absence of a timely appeal .”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. City of Bridge City, 900 S.W.2d 411 (Tex. App. 1995).
“The requirement of immediate payment, of a decision and order of benefit contested case hearing officer during the pendency of an appeal to the Appeals Panel [Tex.Labor Code Ann. § 410.169] ... and Commission Rule 142.”
Texas Workers' Comp. Comm'n v. Harris Cnty., 132 S.W.3d 139 (Tex. App. 2004).
“See Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 410.169 (Vernon 1996) (“A decision of the hearing officer regarding benefits is final in the absence of a timely appeal by a party and is binding during the pendency of an appeal to the appeals panel.”
Lopez v. Zenith Ins. Co., 229 S.W.3d 775 (Tex. App. 2007).
“Tex. Lab.Code ANN. § 410.169 (Vernon 2006); see also TIG Premier Ins.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.