Sec. 62.204. REQUIRED FINDINGS. At the trial of an action brought under this subchapter, the plaintiff recovers if the jury or the court finds from a preponderance of the evidence that:
(1) the plaintiff is or has been employed by the defendant at any time during the two years preceding the institution of the action;
(2) the original petition filed by or on behalf of the plaintiff is verified; and
(3) the defendant failed to pay the plaintiff the minimum wage under this chapter.
Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 269, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 1998–2019 · leading case:
Jones v. Fowler, 969 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1998).
Jones v. Fowler, 969 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1998).
“As Jones argues, some changes in the Labor Code indicate that the Legislature intended “preceding” to mean “immediately preceding.” For example, the Revisor’s Note to section 62.”
Martagon v. Murillo (N.D. Tex. 2019).
“TEX. LAB. CODE § 62.204(2). Defendants first argue that Plaintiffs’ FLSA and TMWA claims fail because the complaint: (1) does not include an approximation of hours for which they were not compensated or any instance where they recall not being paid overtime; (2) refers to a…”
Tex. Lab. Code § 62.204(2): 1 case
Martagon v. Murillo (N.D. Tex. 2019).
“TEX. LAB. CODE § 62.204(2). Defendants first argue that Plaintiffs’ FLSA and TMWA claims fail because the complaint: (1) does not include an approximation of hours for which they were not compensated or any instance where they recall not being paid overtime; (2) refers to a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.