Tex. Codes » Occupations Code · TITLE 6. REGULATION OF ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, LAND SURVEYING, AND RELATED PRACTICES · SUBTITLE A. REGULATION OF ENGINEERING AND RELATED PRACTICES · CHAPTER 1001. TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
Texas Codes

Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601 (2026)

Board Advisory Opinions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 1001.601. BOARD ADVISORY OPINIONS. (a) On its own initiative or at the request of any interested person, the board shall prepare a written advisory opinion about:

(1) an interpretation of this chapter or Chapter 1071; or

(2) the application of this chapter or Chapter 1071 to a person in regard to a specified existing or hypothetical factual situation.

(b) The board shall respond to requests for opinions within 180 days unless the board affirmatively states the board's reason:

(1) for not responding to the request within 180 days; or

(2) for not responding to the request at all.

Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 1168, Sec. 32, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.

Amended by:

Acts 2005, 79th Leg., Ch. 259 (H.B. 1817), Sec. 6, eff. September 1, 2005.

Acts 2025, 89th Leg., R.S., Ch. 812 (S.B. 1259), Sec. 2, eff. September 1, 2025.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Bd. of Prof'l Engineers (Tex. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Bd. of Prof'l Engineers (Tex. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “6 Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601(a) ............”
Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Bd. of Prof'l Engineers (Tex. App. 2015). “6 Tex. Occ. Code, § 1001.601. . . . . . . .”
Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601(a): 1 case
Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Bd. of Prof'l Engineers (Tex. App. 2015). “6 Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601(a) ............”
Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601(b): 1 case
Raghunath Dass, P.E. v. Texas Bd. of Prof'l Engineers (Tex. App. 2015). “6 Tex. Occ. Code § 1001.601(a) ............”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.