Texas Codes

Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059 (2026)

Temporary Suspension Or Restriction Of License

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 164.059. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OR RESTRICTION OF LICENSE. (a) The president of the board shall appoint a three-member disciplinary panel consisting of board members to determine whether a person's license to practice medicine should be temporarily suspended or restricted.

(b) If the disciplinary panel determines from the evidence presented to the panel that a person licensed to practice medicine would, by the person's continuation in practice, constitute a continuing threat to the public welfare, the disciplinary panel shall temporarily suspend or restrict the license of that person.

(c) A license may be suspended or restricted by a disciplinary panel under this section without notice or hearing if:

(1) the board immediately provides notice of the suspension or restriction to the license holder; and

(2) a hearing on the temporary suspension or restriction before a disciplinary panel of the board is scheduled for the earliest possible date after 10 days' notice of hearing.

(d) Notwithstanding Chapter 551, Government Code, the disciplinary panel may hold a meeting by telephone conference call if immediate action is required and convening of the panel at one location is inconvenient for any member of the disciplinary panel.

(e) After the hearing before the disciplinary panel described by Subsection (c), if the disciplinary panel affirms the temporary suspension or restriction of the license holder's license, the board shall schedule an informal compliance meeting that meets the requirements of Section 2001.054(c), Government Code, and Section 164.004 of this code to be held as soon as practicable, unless the license holder waives the informal meeting or an informal meeting has already been held with regard to the issues that are the basis for the temporary suspension or restriction.

(f) If the license holder is unable to show compliance at the informal meeting described by Subsection (e) regarding the issues that are the basis for the temporary suspension or restriction, a board representative shall file a formal complaint under Section 164.005 as soon as practicable.

(g) If, after the hearing described by Subsection (c), the disciplinary panel does not temporarily suspend or restrict the license holder's license, the facts that were the basis for the temporary suspension or restriction may not be the sole basis of another proceeding to temporarily suspend or restrict the license holder's license. The board may use those same facts in a subsequent investigation to obtain new information that may be the basis for the temporary suspension or restriction of the license holder's license. For purposes of this subsection, facts that are the basis for the temporary suspension or restriction of a license holder's license include facts presented to the disciplinary panel and facts presented by the board or a representative of the board at the time evidence was presented to the disciplinary panel.

Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 388, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999. Amended by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 202, Sec. 34, eff. June 10, 2003.

Notes of Decisions
Robert W. Van Boven M.D., D.D.S. v. Scott Freshour, Margaret McNeese, Chris Palazola, Amy Swanholm, Timothy Webb, & Sherif Zaafran, M.D., in Their Off. Capacities as Officers of the Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. 2022). · cites it 4× “TEX. OCC. CODE § 164.059. The panel made a prediction, based on the evidence before it, that the temporary restriction was necessary to protect the public welfare.”
Texas Med. Bd. &, in Their Off. Capacities Only Irvin E. Zeitler, Jr., D.O. President, Marl Robinson Exec. Dir., Michael Arambula, M.D., Pharm.D. James Scott Holliday, D.O. & Carlos L. Gallardo, Members of the Bd. v. Benjamin Wiseman, M.D. (Tex. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “See Tex. Occ. Code §§ 164.059, .0595. Because the action at issue here is the temporary suspension of Wiseman’s license, for brevity, we will simply use the term “suspension.”
Hernandez Caruso v. Texas Med. Bd. (W.D. Tex. 2024). “Caruso also argues that the Board failed to appoint a three-member disciplinary panel to determine whether Caruso’s license should be restricted as required by Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059. But that section applies only when the Board is determining whether a medical license should…”
Maynard v. Drug Enf't Admin., 117 F. App'x 941 (5th Cir. 2004). “On June 20, 2003, pursuant to Texas Occupations Code § 164.059, the Disciplinary Panel concluded that Maynard’s “continuation in the practice of medicine would constitute a continuing threat to the public welfare.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059(a) — 1 case
— Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059(b) — 4 cases
Robert W. Van Boven M.D., D.D.S. v. Scott Freshour, Margaret McNeese, Chris Palazola, Amy Swanholm, Timothy Webb, & Sherif Zaafran, M.D., in Their Off. Capacities as Officers of the Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. 2022). “TEX. OCC. CODE § 164.059. The panel made a prediction, based on the evidence before it, that the temporary restriction was necessary to protect the public welfare.”
Texas Med. Bd. &, in Their Off. Capacities Only Irvin E. Zeitler, Jr., D.O. President, Marl Robinson Exec. Dir., Michael Arambula, M.D., Pharm.D. James Scott Holliday, D.O. & Carlos L. Gallardo, Members of the Bd. v. Benjamin Wiseman, M.D. (Tex. App. 2014). “See Tex. Occ. Code §§ 164.059, .0595. Because the action at issue here is the temporary suspension of Wiseman’s license, for brevity, we will simply use the term “suspension.”
— Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059(c) — 1 case
— Tex. Occ. Code § 164.059(e) — 2 cases
Robert W. Van Boven M.D., D.D.S. v. Scott Freshour, Margaret McNeese, Chris Palazola, Amy Swanholm, Timothy Webb, & Sherif Zaafran, M.D., in Their Off. Capacities as Officers of the Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. 2022). “TEX. OCC. CODE § 164.059. The panel made a prediction, based on the evidence before it, that the temporary restriction was necessary to protect the public welfare.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.