Sec. 22.06. CONSENT AS DEFENSE TO ASSAULTIVE CONDUCT. (a) The victim's effective consent or the actor's reasonable belief that the victim consented to the actor's conduct is a defense to prosecution under Section 22.01 (Assault), 22.02 (Aggravated Assault), or 22.05 (Deadly Conduct) if:
(1) the conduct did not threaten or inflict serious bodily injury; or
(2) the victim knew the conduct was a risk of:
(A) his occupation;
(B) recognized medical treatment; or
(C) a scientific experiment conducted by recognized methods.
(b) The defense to prosecution provided by Subsection (a) is not available to a defendant who commits an offense described by Subsection (a) as a condition of the defendant's or the victim's initiation or continued membership in a criminal street gang, as defined by Section 71.01.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Amended by:
Acts 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., Ch. 273 (H.B. 184), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2007.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
48
cases (
7 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case:
Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “" See Tex. Pen. Code § 22.06(1). 5 . The words "on or about” were not defined in the charge.”
Tolbert v. State, 306 S.W.3d 776 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “' To obtain review on appeal, complaints involving `law applicable to the case' need not be preserved at trial but `defensive issues' must be preserved.”
Cornet v. State, 359 S.W.3d 217 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
· cites it 2× “See Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a)(2)(B) ("The victim's effective consent .”
Allen v. State, 253 S.W.3d 260 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008).
“Tex. Penal Code § 22.06 ("The victim’s effective consent or the actor’s reasonable belief that the victim consented to the actor’s conduct is a defense to prosecution under Section 22.”
Davis v. State, 533 S.W.3d 498 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2017).
“Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.06 (a)(1) (West, *514 Westlaw through 2015 R.”
Bufkin v. State, 179 S.W.3d 166 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005).
“Jury Instruction on Consent In his third point of error, appellant complains that the trial court improperly refused to provide a jury instruction on the issue of consent because there was some evidence that Hooper consented to appellant’s actions. Therefore, he avers that the…”
Tanksley v. State, 656 S.W.2d 194 (Tex. App.—Austin 1983).
· cites it 2× “Appellant’s second ground of error urges effective consent to the assault as set forth in the following language of Tex.Pen. Code Ann. § 22.06: The victim’s effective consent .”
Miller v. State, 312 S.W.3d 209 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2010).
“Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.06 (a)(1) (Vernon 2003).”
State v. George, 937 S.W.2d 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 2× “1-17-08 (1995); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.06 (West 1996).”
Amaro v. State, 287 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009).
“Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.06(a)(2)(A) (Vernon Supp.”
Johnson v. State, 227 S.W.3d 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007).
“07(a)(ll), and a defensive charge under Texas Penal Code section 22.06(1), entitled "Consent as a Defense to Assaultive Conduct.”
Valdez v. State, 993 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1999).
“Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.06 (Vernon 1994).”
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(1): 6 cases
Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
“" See Tex. Pen. Code § 22.06(1). 5 . The words "on or about” were not defined in the charge.”
Bufkin v. State, 179 S.W.3d 166 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2005).
“Jury Instruction on Consent In his third point of error, appellant complains that the trial court improperly refused to provide a jury instruction on the issue of consent because there was some evidence that Hooper consented to appellant’s actions. Therefore, he avers that the…”
Johnson v. State, 227 S.W.3d 180 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007).
“07(a)(ll), and a defensive charge under Texas Penal Code section 22.06(1), entitled "Consent as a Defense to Assaultive Conduct.”
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(2)(A): 2 cases
Tanksley v. State, 656 S.W.2d 194 (Tex. App.—Austin 1983).
“Appellant’s second ground of error urges effective consent to the assault as set forth in the following language of Tex.Pen. Code Ann. § 22.06: The victim’s effective consent .”
State v. George, 937 S.W.2d 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).
“1-17-08 (1995); Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.06 (West 1996).”
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a): 6 cases
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a)(1): 8 cases
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a)(2)(A): 2 cases
Amaro v. State, 287 S.W.3d 825 (Tex. App.—Waco 2009).
“Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 22.06(a)(2)(A) (Vernon Supp.”
Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a)(2)(B): 1 case
Cornet v. State, 359 S.W.3d 217 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).
“See Tex. Penal Code § 22.06(a)(2)(B) ("The victim's effective consent .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.