Sec. 92.109. LIABILITY OF LANDLORD. (a) A landlord who in bad faith retains a security deposit in violation of this subchapter is liable for an amount equal to the sum of $100, three times the portion of the deposit wrongfully withheld, and the tenant's reasonable attorney's fees in a suit to recover the deposit.
(b) A landlord who in bad faith does not provide a written description and itemized list of damages and charges in violation of this subchapter:
(1) forfeits the right to withhold any portion of the security deposit or to bring suit against the tenant for damages to the premises; and
(2) is liable for the tenant's reasonable attorney's fees in a suit to recover the deposit.
(c) In an action brought by a tenant under this subchapter, the landlord has the burden of proving that the retention of any portion of the security deposit was reasonable.
(d) A landlord who fails either to return a security deposit or to provide a written description and itemization of deductions on or before the 30th day after the date the tenant surrenders possession is presumed to have acted in bad faith.
Acts 1983, 68th Leg., p. 3641, ch. 576, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
53
cases (
9 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case:
Pulley v. Milberger, 198 S.W.3d 418 (Tex. App. 2006).
Pulley v. Milberger, 198 S.W.3d 418 (Tex. App. 2006).
· cites it 7× “See Tex. PROP.Code AnN. § 92.109 (Vernon 1995).”
Shamoun v. Shough, 377 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App. 2012).
· cites it 5× “See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 92.109 (a) (landlord “who in bad faith” retains a security deposit is liable for three times the portion of the *78 deposit wrongfully withheld).”
Smith v. Padgett, 513 N.E.2d 737 (Ohio 1987).
“Chapter 80, Paragraph 101, Section 1; Tex. Property Code Ann. Section 92.109. See R.”
Williams v. Colthurst, 253 S.W.3d 353 (Tex. App. 2008).
“See Tex. PROp.Code Ann. § 92.109 (Vernon 2007).”
Hanks v. Lake Towne Apts., 812 S.W.2d 625 (Tex. App. 1991).
· cites it 2× “We acknowledge that the claim, like the issue regarding the right of possession, arises out of the tenant-landlord relationship.”
Reed v. Ford, 760 S.W.2d 26 (Tex. App. 1988).
· cites it 3× “Tenant sued Owner, seeking a refund of his security deposit as well as penalties and attorneys’ fees under the Texas Property Code. TEX.PROP.CODE ANN. § 92.”
Leskinen v. Burford, 892 S.W.2d 135 (Tex. App. 1994).
· cites it 2× “” Tex.Prop.Code Ann. § 92.108 (Vernon 1984) (Re-visor’s Note).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(a) — 22 cases
Pulley v. Milberger, 198 S.W.3d 418 (Tex. App. 2006).
“See Tex. PROP.Code AnN. § 92.109 (Vernon 1995).”
Hanks v. Lake Towne Apts., 812 S.W.2d 625 (Tex. App. 1991).
“We acknowledge that the claim, like the issue regarding the right of possession, arises out of the tenant-landlord relationship.”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(b) — 4 cases
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(b)(1) — 1 case
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(b)(2) — 1 case
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(c) — 13 cases
Pulley v. Milberger, 198 S.W.3d 418 (Tex. App. 2006).
“See Tex. PROP.Code AnN. § 92.109 (Vernon 1995).”
Shamoun v. Shough, 377 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App. 2012).
“See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 92.109 (a) (landlord “who in bad faith” retains a security deposit is liable for three times the portion of the *78 deposit wrongfully withheld).”
— Tex. Prop. Code § 92.109(d) — 16 cases
Shamoun v. Shough, 377 S.W.3d 63 (Tex. App. 2012).
“See Tex. Prop. Code Ann. § 92.109 (a) (landlord “who in bad faith” retains a security deposit is liable for three times the portion of the *78 deposit wrongfully withheld).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.