Texas Codes

Tex. Transp. Code § 251.102 (2026)

Cost Of Relocating Or Adjusting Utility Facility

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 251.102. COST OF RELOCATING OR ADJUSTING UTILITY FACILITY. A county shall include the cost of relocating or adjusting an eligible utility facility in the expense of right-of-way acquisition.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: Sw. Bell Tel., L.P. v. Harris Cnty. Toll Road Auth., 282 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2009).
Sw. Bell Tel., L.P. v. Harris Cnty. Toll Road Auth., 282 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2009). · cites it 3× “I, §§ 17, 19; Tex. Transp. Code § 251.102. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and the trial court denied Harris County’s motion and granted SBC’s.”
CenterPoint Energy Houston Elec. LLC v. Harris Cnty. Toll Road Auth., 436 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2006). “See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 251.102 , Historical and Statutory Notes, Prior Laws.”
Sw. Bell Tel., L.P. v. Emmett, 401 S.W.3d 826 (Tex. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “I, §§ 17, 19; Tex. Transp. Code Ann. § 251.102 (Vernon 1999).”
Fort Bend Cnty. v. Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co., 237 S.W.3d 355 (Tex. App. 2007). “TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 251.102 (Vernon 1999).”
Harris Cnty. Toll Road Auth. & Harris Cnty. v. Sw. Bell Tel., LP D/B/A SBC Texas, 263 S.W.3d 48 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 4× “I, §§ 17,19; Tex. TRAnsp. Code Ann. § 251.102 (Vernon 1999).”
HARRIS CTY TOLL RD. AUTH. v. Sw. Bell Tel., LP, 263 S.W.3d 48 (Tex. App. 2006). · cites it 5× “I, §§ 17, 19; TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 251.102 (Vernon 1999).”
State of Texas v. Frank's Nursery, LLC (Tex. App. 2024). “” Tex. Transp. Code § 251.102. However, because there was no clear and unambiguous waiver of sovereign immunity, the supreme court held that the plaintiff had no statutory cause of action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.