Tex. Codes » Tax Code · TITLE 1. PROPERTY TAX CODE · SUBTITLE F. REMEDIES · CHAPTER 41. LOCAL REVIEW
Texas Codes

Tex. Tax Code § 41.06 (2026)

Notice Of Challenge Hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 41.06. NOTICE OF CHALLENGE HEARING. (a) The secretary of the appraisal review board shall deliver to the presiding officer of the governing body of each taxing unit entitled to appear at a challenge hearing written notice of the date, time, and place fixed for the hearing. The secretary shall deliver the notice not later than the 10th day before the date of the hearing.

(b) The secretary shall give the chief appraiser advance notice of the date, time, place, and subject matter of each challenge hearing.

(c) If the challenge relates to a taxable leasehold or other possessory interest in real property that is owned by this state or a political subdivision of this state, the secretary shall deliver notice of the hearing as provided by Subsection (a) to:

(1) the attorney general and the state agency that owns the real property, in the case of real property owned by this state; or

(2) the governing body of the political subdivision, in the case of real property owned by a political subdivision.

Acts 1979, 66th Leg., p. 2303, ch. 841, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1982. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 416, Sec. 2, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 519 S.W.3d 113 (Tex. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harris Cnty. Appraisal Dist. v. Texas Workforce Comm'n, 519 S.W.3d 113 (Tex. 2017). “Tex. Tax Code §§ 41.06, .46. Although the hearings were held in rooms located in the building where the HCAD and appraisal review board offices are located, there is no evidence that HCAD had the right to mandate where the Board members performed their services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.