Texas Codes

Tex. Util. Code § 52.108 (2026)

Other Prohibited Practices

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 52.108. OTHER PROHIBITED PRACTICES. The commission may enter any order necessary to protect the public interest if the commission finds after notice and hearing that a telecommunications utility has:

(1) failed to maintain statewide average rates;

(2) abandoned interexchange message telecommunications service to a local exchange area in a manner contrary to the public interest;

(3) engaged in a pattern of preferential or discriminatory activities prohibited by Section 53.003, 55.005, or 55.006; or

(4) failed to pass switched access rate reductions to customers under Chapter 56 or other law, as required by Section 52.112.

Acts 1997, 75th Leg., ch. 166, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1997. Amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1212, Sec. 10, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: AT & T Commc'ns of Texas, L.P. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 186 S.W.3d 517 (Tex. 2006).
AT & T Commc'ns of Texas, L.P. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 186 S.W.3d 517 (Tex. 2006). “("When the legislature set the switched-access rates and SWBT became an electing company, the rates authorized under the leg *531 islative scheme are not only reasonable, but also valid.”
ASAP Paging Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas, 213 S.W.3d 380 (Tex. App. 2006). “See Tex. Util. Code Ann. §§ 52.108 (3) (West Supp.”
ASAP Paging, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas & CenturyTel of San Marcos, Inc. (Tex. App. 2006). “See Tex. Util. Code Ann. §§ 52.108 (3) (West Supp.”
ASAP Paging, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Texas & CenturyTel of San Marcos, Inc. (Tex. App. 2006). “See Tex. Util. Code Ann. §§ 52.108 (3) (West Supp.”
Tex. Util. Code § 52.108(3): 1 case
AT & T Commc'ns of Texas, L.P. v. Sw. Bell Tel. Co., 186 S.W.3d 517 (Tex. 2006). “("When the legislature set the switched-access rates and SWBT became an electing company, the rates authorized under the leg *531 islative scheme are not only reasonable, but also valid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.