10 U.S.C. § 133
Repealed. Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title IX, § 901(a)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2339]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1965–2009 · leading case: Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34 (1972).
Parisi v. Davidson, 405 U.S. 34 (1972). “6 (May 10, 1968), issued by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to his authority under 10 U. S. C. § 133 . The purpose of the directive is to provide "uniform procedures for the utilization of conscientious objectors in the Armed Forces and consideration of requests for discharge…”
Thomas E. Egan v. Dep't of the Navy, 802 F.2d 1563 (Fed. Cir. 1986). “That the Navy did not argue inability to use § 7532 is no basis for punishing it by subjecting its judgments on security clearances to second guessing by MSPB, or for disregarding the arguments it did make. . Congress has granted to the secretaries of the military services,…”
P. F. C. Daniel E. Pitcher v. Melvin Laird, as Sec'y of Defenses., 421 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir. 1970). “But, in 1962, pursuant to 10 U.S.C.A. § 133 , see Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.”
Royal Stand. Ins. Co. v. Robert S. McNamara Sec'y of Def., United States of Am., 344 F.2d 240 (8th Cir. 1965). “” As to the Secretary of Defense, Congress has specifically provided, 10 U.S. C.A. § 133: “Secretary of Defense: appointment; powers and duties; delegation by “(a) There is a Secretary of Defense, who is the head of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the…”
Davis v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 209 (Vet. App. 1997). “2d 694 (1984)); 10 U.S.C. § 133 (a) (“Secretary of Defense .”
Brown v. McNamara, 263 F. Supp. 686 (D.N.J. 1967). “The Defense Department Directive was issued by the Secretary of Defense under his general power to control the Department of Defense, 10 U.S.C. § 133 . The stated purpose of the directive was to establish ■“uniform procedures for the utilization of conscientious objectors in the…”
Hammond v. Lenfest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968). “But, in 1962, pursuant to the authority of 10 U.S.C. § 133 (1964), see Brown v. McNamara, supra, 263 F.”
Jenness v. Forbes, 351 F. Supp. 88 (D.R.I. 1972). “” 10 U.S.C.A. § 133 . “§ 133. Secretary of Defense : appointment ; powers and duties; delegation by (a) There is a Secretary of Defense, who is the head of the Department of Defense, appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.”
McGehee v. McKaney, 312 F. Supp. 1372 (D. Maryland 1970). “On May 10, 1968, pursuant to the general power of the Secretary of Defense as the chief executive officer of the Department of Defense under 10 U.S.C. § 133 , that Department promulgated D.”
Koster v. Sharp, 303 F. Supp. 837 (E.D. Pa. 1969). “6, which was issued on August 21, 1962, by the then Secretary of Defense pursuant to authority vested in him by 10 U.S.C. § 133 . These regulations were amended effective May 10, 1968, 33 Federal Register No.”
Moore v. Connell, 318 F. Supp. 884 (D. Maryland 1970). “On May 10, 1968, pursuant to the general power of the Secretary of Defense as the chief executive officer of the Department of Defense under 10 U.S.C. § 133 , that Department promulgated D.”
Baldauf v. Nitze, 261 F. Supp. 167 (S.D. Cal. 1966). “§ 22 , as it existed as of January 1966, the Congress provided “The head of each department is authorized to prescribe regulations not inconsistent with law, for the government of his department * * * ”, and by 10 U.S.C.A. § 133 (1962) the Secretary of Defense is authorized to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.