10 U.S.C. § 2302
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1806(d), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4155]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2022 · leading case: Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., & Lucent Tech. Inc., United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 177 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., & Lucent Tech. Inc., United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 177 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “In a Memorandum for Service Acquisition Executives, Directors of the Defense Agencies issued February 11, 1988, Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Costello instructed that “[t]he definition of major system at 10 U.S.C. § 2302 (5) is the definition of that term for the…”
Cybertech Grp., Inc. v. United States, 48 Fed. Cl. 638 (Fed. Cl. 2001). “See also 10 U.S.C. § 2302 (2)(C); 41 U.S.C. § 259 (b)(3) (stating that the term “competitive procedures” includes the procedures established by GSA for the multiple award schedule program if (i) participation in the program has been open to all responsible sources; and (ii)…”
ATA Def. Indus., Inc. v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 489 (Fed. Cl. 1997). “Code Cong. & Ad. News 2110. Indeed, “full and open competition” “means that all responsible sources are permitted to submit sealed bids or competitive proposals on the procurement.”
Palantir Usg, Inc. v. United States, 904 F.3d 980 (Fed. Cir. 2018). “10 U.S.C. § 2302 . Regarding products, a "commercial item" is defined as an "item .”
Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United States, 539 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “10 U.S.C. § 2302 (3) (Armed Services Procurement Act also defining “procurement” by reference to the definition employed in *1346 41 U.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, 124 F.3d 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1997). “” This argument is bolstered by a memorandum issued by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition some six weeks after passage of the 1988 Act, defining the term “major system” *1476 by reference to a definition contained in a different and pre-existing part of the laws…”
Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Comm'r of Health & Hospitals, 481 N.E.2d 441 (Mass. 1985). “§§ 1511-1520 (1982), Congress set forth certain restrictions on the DOD's chemical and biological warfare programs. For example, § 1511 requires that the Secretary of Defense submit an annual report to Congress detailing the research conducted during the preceding year on…”
Am. Fed'n of Gov't Employees, Local 2119 v. William S. Cohen, 171 F.3d 460 (7th Cir. 1999). “10 U.S.C. § 2302 (3)(D). The plaintiffs further claim that the definition of “responsible sources” is broad enough to include government arsenals.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. United States, 32 Fed. Cl. 672 (Fed. Cl. 1995). “This memorandum instructed that, for purposes of section 8118, a major system was to be given the same definition as applied to that term in 10 U.S.C. § 2302 (5). That section reads in relevant part as follows: The term “major system” means a combination of elements that will…”
Distributed Solutions, Inc. v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 368 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “10 U.S.C. § 2302 (1); 41 U.S.C. § 252 (a).”
NISH v. Rumsfeld, 188 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (D.N.M. 2002). “10 U.S.C. §§ 2302 , 2304(a)(1). The provision allowing for a noncompetitive process when authorized by statute is referred to by the parties as the CICA “savings clause.”
Universal Marine Co., K.S.C. v. United States, 120 Fed. Cl. 240 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “(“CICA”), and 10 U.S.C. § 2302 (3). Count I seeks declaratory relief.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.