10 U.S.C. § 508
Reenlistment: qualifications
2023—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 118–31 struck out “Regular” before “Space Force”.
2021—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted “Regular Marine Corps, Regular Space Force,” for “Regular Marine Corps,”.
For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1977–2023 · leading case: Neal v. Sec'y of the Navy, 472 F. Supp. 763 (E.D. Pa. 1979).
Neal v. Sec'y of the Navy, 472 F. Supp. 763 (E.D. Pa. 1979). “The Commandant, with power delegated to him by the Secretary of the Navy, exercises plenary control over reenlistments pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (1976), which provides: (b) A person discharged from a Regular component may be reenlisted in the Regular Marine Corps .”
Joseph S. Neal v. Sec'y of the Navy & Commandant of the Marine Corps, 639 F.2d 1029 (3rd Cir. 1981). “” 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (1976). See In re Richardson, 209 Ct.”
Harper v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 287 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “Moreover, defendant cites statutory authority, 10 U.S.C. § 508 (a) (2006), that specifically denies plaintiff the right to reenlist because of the finding of guilt against him at the NJP for wrongful use of cocaine.”
United States v. Clardy, 13 M.J. 308 (1982). “In addition, Congress provided in 10 U.S.C. § 508 , that a person so discharged might be reenlisted.”
Williams v. United States, 541 F. Supp. 1187 (E.D.N.C. 1982). “” 10 U.S.C. § 508 (a) (1976) (emphasis added).”
Anderson v. United States, 46 Fed. Cl. 725 (Fed. Cl. 2000). “, citing 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (1988). Dismissals are generally not presumed to be a final adjudication based upon the case when it is made without prejudice.”
Stein v. United States, 121 Fed. Cl. 248 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “§ 505 (d) (2012); 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (2012), and the Secretary has prescribed regulations on the eligibility standard for reenlistment.”
Vance v. United States, 434 F. Supp. 826 (N.D. Tex. 1977). “In addition to the differences in military prestige and privileges, the career progressions of the two groups are markedly different under current statutes in that enlisted men may routinely reenlist for fixed terms, 10 U.S.C.A. § 508 (1975), while officers are subject to an…”
Linsday v. Brown, 9 Vet. App. 225 (Vet. App. 1996). “10 U.S.C. § 508 (codified then at 10 U.S.”
Rich v. Sec'y of Army, 735 F.2d 1220 (10th Cir. 1984). “"); 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (discharged persons may reenlist "under such regulations as the Secretary concerned may prescribe"); 10 U.”
Gove v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 296 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “In response to defendant’s motion, plaintiff cites 10 U.S.C. § 508 (b) (1988), as a predicate for jurisdiction.”
Martin v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 887 (Ct. Cl. 1982). “The statute authorizing reenlistment, 10 U.S.C. §508 (b) (1976), is permissive, not mandatory.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.