10 U.S.C. § 509
Voluntary extension of enlistments: periods and benefits
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2023 · leading case: Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Sec'y of the Army & Philip J. Schrock, 159 F.3d 573 (Fed. Cir. 1999).
Augustin S. James v. Louis Caldera, Sec'y of the Army & Philip J. Schrock, 159 F.3d 573 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “Extensions of enlistments are governed by 10 U.S.C. § 509 (1994) (“Voluntary extension of enlistments: periods and benefits”).”
MacHinist Mate Second Class Ronald W. Johnson v. John N. Chafee, Sec'y of the Navy, 469 F.2d 1216 (2d Cir. 1973). “Section 5539(a) has been superseded by 10 U.S.C. § 509 (1970), which provides that “ .”
United States ex rel. Stone v. Robinson, 431 F.2d 548 (3rd Cir. 1970). “Pursuant to 10 U.S.C.A. § 509 , the Secretary promulgated AFM 35-16(13-1), Chapter 13, Special Instructions (Extensions of Enlistments).”
Pipes v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2020). “…with many other instances of the use of the word “voluntary” throughout Title 10 of the U.S. Code. See, e.g., 10 U.S.C. § 509 (voluntary extension of enlistments); § 638b (incentive for voluntary retirement); § 802 (voluntary enlistment); § 831 (voluntary statements);…”
Boyce v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2023). “§ 505 , at the expiration of his term of enlistment, he was automatically discharged from the Air Force and issued a DD Form 214.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.